DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CIVSB2219892·sanbernardino·Civil·Personal Injury
Hearing about 2 months agoGRANTED

AMBER LYNCH V NORTH POINTE APARTMENTS, et al

Motion to continue trial

Hearing date
Jul 15, 2026
Department
S22
Prevailing
Moving Party
Next hearing
Mar 29, 2027

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffAMBER LYNCH
DefendantNORTH POINTE APARTMENTS

Ruling

TENTATIVE RULING FOR July 15, 2026 Department S22 – Judge David Driscoll This court follows California Rules of Court, rule 3.1308(b) for tentative rulings. (See San Bernardino Superior Court Local Emergency Rule 8.) Tentative rulings for each law & motion will be posted on the internet (https://www.sb-court.org) by 3:00 p.m. on the court day immediately before the hearing.

You may appear in person at the hearing although remote appearance by CourtCall is preferred during the Pandemic. (See www.sb-court.org/general-information/remote-access). If you do not have Internet access or if you experience difficulty with the posted tentative ruling, you may obtain the tentative ruling by calling the department (S-22) at (909) 521-3529 or the Administrative Assistant (909) 708-8756, who prepared the ruling.

If you (or both parties) wish to submit on the Tentative, notify the other party and call the department by 4:00 pm the day before and your appearance may be excused unless the Court orders you to appear.

You must appear at the hearing if you are so directed by the court in the tentative ruling. Be prepared to address those issues set forth by the court in its ruling.

UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, THE PREVAILING PARTY IS TO GIVE NOTICE OF THE RULING. ____________________________________________________________________________

AMBER LYNCH V NORTH POINTE APARTMENTS, et al

____________________________________________________________________________

Plaintiff’s unopposed motion to continue trial is granted. Trial is continued to March 29, 2027, with the TRC on March 25, 2027, both at 8:30 a.m. All related motion, discovery, and expert exchange/designation cut-off dates are extended to the new trial date. Plaintiff to give notice. Additionally, Plaintiff’s counsel is to amend the proposed order relieving counsel of record to reflect the new TRC and Trial dates to assure notice to the pro per plaintiff.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share