DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
PRO2201880·marin·Probate·Trust Administration
Hearing about 2 months agoCONTINUED

IN RE THE AUDREY CALDARA SPECIAL NEEDS TRUST, TRUST OF

Seventh Account and Report of Trustee and Petition for Its Settlement, and for Allowance of Trustee’s Fees and County Counsel’s Fees

Hearing date
Jul 23, 2026
Department
C
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Aug 27, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

OtherMarin County Public Guardian

Attorneys

Ruling

PRO2201880 IN RE THE AUDREY CALDARA SPECIAL NEEDS TRUST, TRUST OF

Seventh Account and Report of Trustee and Petition for Its Settlement, and for Allowance of Trustee’s Fees and County Counsel’s Fees, filed by Marin County Public Guardian on 7/16/26.

Ruling. This matter is continued to August 27, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. Petitioner is ordered to: 1. Mail notice to all interested parties using the mandatory Judicial Council Form “Notice of Hearing – Decedent’s Estate or Trust,” (Judicial Council Forms, form DE-120.)

2. File a copy of the DE-120 that was mailed, with the Proof of Service completed on page 2 showing that all interested parties received at least thirty days’ notice of the Seventh Account. (Prob. Code, § 17203).) The Proof of Service must be filed at least five court days prior to hearing. (Super. Ct. Marin County, Local Rules, rule 6.2(b), Filing, Hearing, and Continuance Procedures.)

PLEASE NOTE: Probate cases that are designated as confidential by California law will not be posted online. For tentative rulings in those matters, please contact the judicial secretary at (415) 444- 7260. Page 6 | 13

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share