DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
PR0001870·marin·Probate·Probate
Hearing about 2 months agoCONTINUED

IN THE MATTER OF MICHAEL S. VISNICK

Petition for Probate of Will and for Letters Testamentary

Hearing date
Jul 23, 2026
Department
C
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Aug 20, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

OtherPaul A. Salvagiona aka Paolo Salvagione

Attorneys

Ruling

PR0001870 IN THE MATTER OF MICHAEL S. VISNICK

Petition for Probate of Will and for Letters Testamentary, filed by Paul A. Salvagiona aka Paolo Salvagione on 6/26/26.

Ruling. This matter is continued to August 20, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. Petitioner is ordered to file the following: 1. Supplement to Petition, signed and verified by Petitioner, that provides more information with regard to: a. The relationship of Decedent’s niece, Anne Visnick. Ex: John Doe, son of Decedent’s predeceased sister, Jane Doe. b. Relationship, age, and address for each of the following parties named in Decedent’s Will: i. Larry Visnick

PLEASE NOTE: Probate cases that are designated as confidential by California law will not be posted online. For tentative rulings in those matters, please contact the judicial secretary at (415) 444- 7260. Page 5 | 13

ii. Alex Shaw iii. Lavisa Mills iv. Teresa (no last name) 2. Proof of Service showing that all parties named in response to Issue 1 received at least fifteen days’ notice of the Petition on the mandatory form “Notice of Petition to Administer Estate.” (Judicial Council Forms, form DE-121; Prob. Code, § 8110.)

3. All documents must be filed at least five court days prior to the hearing. (Super. Ct. Marin County, Local Rules, rule 6.2(b), Filing, Hearing, and Continuance Procedures.)

PRO042729 THE GRAHAM SALTONSTALL SPECIAL NEEDS TRUST, IN THE MATTER OF

Petition to Approve Twelfth Account and Report of Trustee from 2/1/24, Through 1/31/26, and to Confirm Trustee’s and Trust Advisory Committee Member Fees; and Approve Attorneys’ Fees, filed by Westamerica Bank on 6/8/26.

Ruling. The parties are ordered to appear.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share