Conservatorship of Jurado, Francisco Jr.
REVIEW HEARING
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
Conservatorship of Jurado, Francisco Jr. 26-61496
REVIEW HEARING
APPEARANCE REQUIRED
Conservatorship of: Lee James El Gal 26-66178
REVIEW HEARING
TENTATIVE RULING: After a review of the matter, the Court finds the Conservator is acting in the best interest of the Conservatee. Thus, the matter is set for a Review – Biennial hearing in two years, on July 14, 2028, at 8:30 a.m. in Dept. A. The Court Investigator shall prepare a biennial investigator report for the next hearing date. The Clerk is directed to send notice to the parties.
Conservatorship of Ashley Martinez 25PR000128
REVIEW – 1ST YEAR
TENTATIVE RULING: The matter is CONTINUED to August 12, 2026, at 8:30 a.m. in Dept. A to allow the Conservator to file: (1) Notice of Conservatee’s Rights (Judicial Council form GC-341) mailed to relatives of the proposed Conservatee within the second degree; and (2) Care Plan (Judicial Council form GC-355/356). The Clerk is directed to send notice to the parties.
Conservator is encouraged to contact the Court’s Self-Help Center, located on the lower level of the Historic Courthouse at 825 Brown Street, for assistance.
CIVIL LAW & MOTION CALENDAR – Hon. Cynthia P. Smith, Dept. A (Historic Courthouse) at 8:30 a.m.
Eduardo Perez Mendoza et al v. Ronkar Deliveries LLC 23CV001390 Eduardo Perez Mendoza et al v. Ronkar Deliveries LLC 24CV002048
STATUS CONFERENCE RE: STATUS OF SUPREME COURT’S DECISION IN FLOWERS FOOD
APPEARANCE REQUIRED to discuss a briefing schedule on the remaining issues, raised in the motions to compel arbitration pending in both matters, following the United States
2
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”