DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
FDI-19-792192·sf·FamilyLaw·Contempt
Hearing 3 months agoCONTINUED

Dexandro Montalvo v. Lee Lundrigan

Order to Show Cause and Affidavit for Contempt

Hearing date
Jun 23, 2026
Department
403
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$65,769

Parties

PetitionerDexandro Montalvo
RespondentLee Lundrigan

Ruling

1 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 4

5) 6 DEXANDRO MONTALVO,) Case Number: FDI-19-792192) 7 Petitioner) Hearing Date: June 23, 2026) 8 VS.) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM) 9 LEE LUNDRIGAN,) Department: 403) 10 Respondent) Presiding: BOBBY P. LUNA) 11) 12 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND AFFIDAVIT FOR CONTEMPT 13 TENTATIVE RULING 14 The parties are ordered to appear. The parties may appear in person in Department 403 or 15 remotely by Zoom video. If a party chooses to appear by video, that party must abide by the 16 Notice and Instructions for Remote Appearances in San Francisco Family Court set forth above. 17

18 On for hearing is Petitioner Dexandro Montalvo’s Order to Show Cause and Affidavit for Contempt file 19 dated 6/3/25 alleging that Respondent Lee Lundrigan is noncompliant with spousal support orders. 20 Petitioner asserts Respondent owes Petitioner $65,769 in unpaid spousal support (excluding statutory 21 interest). 22

23 At the prior 5/14/26 hearing, the Court ordered Respondent Lee Lundrigan to file an Income and Expense 24 Declaration if Respondent seeks appointment of contempt counsel to represent him in this contempt 25 action. The Court advised Respondent that he can also hire his own attorney. See 5/14/26 Minute Order. 26 Respondent did not file an Income and Expense Declaration. 27

28 The parties are ordered to appear at hearing on 6/23/26 for Respondent’s arraignment. 29

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share