DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD26681981·sf·Civil·Real Property / Housing
Hearing about 2 months agoHEARING REQUIRED. Parties to appear in-person at 8:30 a.m. on July 23, 2026 and engage in meaningful meet and confer efforts.

VALSTOCK VENTURES, LLC VS. TIMOTHY MARTIN ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion To Compel Further Responses To Form Interrogatories, Request For Production Of Documents And Things Aginst Defendant Timothy Martin; Request For Monetary Sanctions; And Request For Issue And Evidence Sanctions

Hearing date
Jul 23, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffVALSTOCK VENTURES, LLC
DefendantTIMOTHY MARTIN

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for July 23, 2026. Line 11. PLAINTIFF VALSTOCK VENTURES, LLC Notice Of Motion And Motion To Compel Further Responses To Form Interrogatories, Request For Production Of Documents And Things Aginst Defendant Timothy Martin; Request For Monetary Sanctions; And Request For Issue And Evidence Sanctions HEARING REQUIRED. Parties to appear in-person at 8:30 a.m. on July 23, 2026 and engage in meaningful meet and confer efforts. Parties to report their progress at 9:30 a.m.

Parties shall have a copy of separate statement indicating all resolved issues, to be handed to the Court.=(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share