JACKSON, THUY vs SN SERVICING CORPORATION

Stanislaus County - Civil - https://www.stanislaus.courts.ca.gov/online-services/tentative-rulings/civil-tentati ve-rulings Civil Tentative Rulings July 23, 2026

The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge John R. Mayne in Department 21: ***There are no tentative rulings in Department 21***

The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge Stacy P. Speiller in Department 22:

CV-24-006546 - JACKSON, THUY vs SN SERVICING CORPORATION - Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment - GRANTED.

Defendants, as the moving parties, have met their burden of demonstrating entitlement to judgment on the two remaining causes of action in the First Amended Complaint. (Code Civ. Proc. Sec. 437c(p)(2).) Based on the declarations of William A. Fogelman and Shiv Samtani and the evidence submitted therewith, as well as the matters subject to judicial notice herein, Defendants have demonstrated compliance with Civ. Code Sec. 2924.9.

The burden then shifts to Plaintiff to submit admissible evidence establishing the existence of material factual disputes preventing judgment. Plaintiff has failed to carry her burden in this regard. The Court notes that Plaintiff has submitted no evidence and erroneously relies on the allegations contained in the First Amended Complaint to support her position, which is insufficient on summary judgment. (Code Civ. Proc. Sec. 437c(p)(2).) Therefore, Defendants are entitled to summary judgment herein.

Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED. The Court further notes that Plaintiff's objections are not submitted in the format required by Cal. Rules of Ct., rule 3.1354; therefore, the Court declines to rule on them. (Hodjat v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Co. (2012) 211 Cal.App.4th 1.)

PR-22-000750 - ESTATE OF MAYHUE, WENDY D - a) Petitioner Stuart Jones' Motion to Compel Responses from Administrator, Joseph Mayhue, to Requests for Production of Documents and for Monetary Sanctions Against Administrator, Joseph Mayhue, for Misuse of the Discovery Process - GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; b) Petitioner's Motion to Compel Responses from Administrator, Joseph Mayhue, to Special Interrogatories and for Monetary Sanctions Against Administrator, Joseph Mayhue, for Misuse of the Discovery Process - GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

a) Requests for Production, Set Two

The motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Administrator Joseph Mayhue shall serve verified further responses to Requests for Production, Set Two, Nos. 3 through 5, within 20 days of service of the order and shall produce all responsive, nonprivileged documents. Objections based on relevance, overbreadth, privacy, and the existence of the related civil action are OVERRULED. Any responsive documents containing account numbers or comparable identifying financial information may be appropriately redacted.

Any claim of privilege shall be supported by a privilege log. The request to deem all objections waived is DENIED. The request for monetary sanctions is DENIED. The Court finds Administrator's opposition was supported by substantial justification concerning the relationship between this proceeding and the related civil action. Moving Party to submit a proposed order in five court days that is consistent with this ruling.

b) Special Interrogatories, Set Two

The motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Administrator Joseph Mayhue shall serve verified code-compliant further responses to Special Interrogatories, Set Two, Nos. 10 through 14, within 20 days of service of the order. Objections based solely on relevance, overbreadth, privacy, and the existence of the related civil action are