DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
01359872·orange·Probate·Trust
Hearing about 2 months agoDENIED

Yale – Trust

MOTION TO COMPEL (ROA 371)

Hearing date
Jul 22, 2026
Department
CM7
Judge
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Discovery rulings statewide →

Parties

PetitionerDouglas Yale
OtherBank of America, N.A.

Ruling

A motion for a prefiling order must be made pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 391.7.

For reasons stated above, the entirety of this motion is DENIED as procedurally defective.

Counsel for Petitioner is ordered to give notice.

01359872 Yale – Trust

Case: Yale – Trust 01359872

Calendar No.: 4

Date: 07/22/2026

MOTION TO COMPEL (ROA 371)

Petitioner Douglas Yale (“Petitioner”), in propria persona, moves for an order compelling third party Bank of America, N.A. (“BANA”) to comply with a deposition subpoena.

In opposition, BANA states that the Notices to Consumer did not indicate that the proper consumer had been served because the Trustee was only named as an individual. Once BANA confirmed with Petitioner that the proper consumer had been served, it complied with the subpoena by producing documents on 7/8/26. (ROA 466.)

The court’s records do not reflect that Petitioner has met and conferred regarding the production, and no updated separate statement has been filed.

Based on the foregoing, the motion is DENIED as moot. If Petitioner is unsatisfied with the production, he must meet and confer and file a new motion.

Petitioner is ordered to give notice of this ruling on BANA and on all parties who have appeared in this action.

01483366 Aaron – Trust TENTATIVE RULING

Case: Aaron – Trust 01483366

Calendar No.: 5

Date: 07/22/2026 MOTION FOR ORDER APPROVING AMENDED LIS PENDENS (ROA 168)

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share