Request for Order (RFO)
LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DEPARTMENT 5 July 23, 2026 8:30 a.m./1:30 p.m.
12. NICOLE CRADDOCK V. NATHAN CRADDOCK, JR. 24FL0996
Petitioner filed a Request for Order (RFO) on April 7, 2026, seeking child and spousal support orders. Petitioner concurrently filed an Income and Expense Declaration. Upon review of the court file, there is no Proof of Service showing Respondent was properly served.
Petitioner appeared for the hearing on May 21, 2026 and requested a continuance to allow additional time to serve Respondent. The court granted the request to continue the matter and directed Petitioner to serve Respondent with the original moving papers as well as a copy of the minute order with the continued hearing date and time.
Proof of Service shows Respondent was mail served on June 22, 2026 with all the required documents.
The Department of Child Support Services (DCSS) substituted into the case on July 14, 2026. Notice was provided to the parties the same day.
The court finds good cause to continue the matter to Monday, September 14th at 8:30 AM in Department 10 pursuant to Family Code section 4251. Respondent is directed to file and serve his Income and Expense Declaration at least 10 days prior to the hearing.
TENTATIVE RULING #12: THE COURT FINDS GOOD CAUSE TO CONTINUE THE MATTER TO MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 14TH AT 8:30 AM IN DEPARTMENT 10 PURSUANT TO FAMILY CODE SECTION 4251. RESPONDENT IS DIRECTED TO FILE AND SERVE HIS INCOME AND EXPENSE DECLARATION AT LEAST 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING.
NO HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HELD UNLESS A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT IS TRANSMITTED ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH THE COURT’S WEBSITE OR BY PHONE CALL TO THE COURT AT (530) 621-6725 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07; SEE ALSO LEWIS V. SUPERIOR COURT, 19 CAL.4TH 1232, 1247 (1999). NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT AND THE GROUNDS UPON WHICH ARGUMENT IS BEING REQUESTED MUST BE MADE BY PHONE CALL OR IN PERSON BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”