BREDA MITCHELL VS. MARTINA MITCHELL ET AL

Set for Law and Motion/Discovery Calendar on Thursday, July 23, 2026, Line 1.

Cross-defendant Breda Mitchell's motion to strike the cross-complaint filed by cross-complainant Martina Mitchell is granted. The cross-complaint is stricken because Martina was required to seek leave of court to file and she did not.

The arcane issue presented by this motion is whether the word "complaint" in CCP 428.50(a) includes both an original complaint and an amended complaint or only an original complaint. The parties have not cited any published case law addressing this issue and I could not locate any case law on the issue. A leading, authoritative, and highly respected treatise states: "[L]eave of court will be required when defendant seeks to cross-complain against plaintiff after having previously filed an answer." (Brown and Weil, California Practice Guide: Civil Procedure Before Trial (TRG 2025 Update) 6:555(emphasis in original)). I agree.

As a matter of statutory interpretation, supported by strong "practical considerations" to avoid "adversely [impacting] on the ability of trial courts to administer their calendars efficiently" (Loney v. Superior Court (1984) 160 Cal. App. 3d 719, 723), I construe the word "complaint" in CCP 428.50(a) to refer only to an original complaint, and not to an amended complaint. If Martina's position were adopted, that would mean that a defendant who had never previously filed a cross-complaint could file one mid-trial if the court allowed the plaintiff to amend her complaint to make only a technical, non-substantive change.

For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 302 Zoom ID 160 409 7690; Passcode 516287.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.

Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.

Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept302tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.

The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/HEK) | |