Rise Grass Valley, Inc. vs. Board of Super. of Nevada County, et al.

record and the law for factual and legal support that a party has failed to identify or provide.” Id. at 934.

Accordingly, the motion is denied.

6. CU0002304 Jason Christ v. Jordan Hannah

On the Court’s motion, this hearing is continued to March 9, 2026, at 10:00 a.m.

Plaintiff’s December 8, 2025, motion to strike the answer and cross-complaint is denied.

Defendant urges the Court to deny the motion because no supporting memorandum of points and authorities was filed by Plaintiff. The Court agrees.

Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.113 “requires motions to be supported by memoranda containing ‘a statement of facts, a concise statement of the law, evidence and arguments relied on, and a discussion of the statutes, cases, and textbooks cited in support of the position advanced,” and provides that a motion's failure to provide such a memorandum can be construed “as an admission that the motion ... is not meritorious....’ ” Quantum Cooking Concepts, Inc. v. LV Associates, Inc. (2011) 197 Cal.App.4th 927, 931, quoting Rule 3.1113(b) & (a). “Rule 3.1113 rests on a policy-based allocation of resources, preventing the trial court from being cast as a tacit advocate for the moving party's theories by freeing it from any obligation to comb the record and the law for factual and legal support that a party has failed to identify or provide.” Id. at 934.

Accordingly, the motion is denied.

7. CU0002112 Martin F. Ryan vs. Lisa Dunne

Defendant Dunne apparently reserved this date for the filing of a motion; none was filed. This matter is dropped from calendar.

8. CU0001386 Rise Grass Valley, Inc. vs. Board of Super. of Nevada County, et al.

On the Court’s motion, this hearing is continued to March 9, 2026, at 11:15 a.m.

Argument shall be heard in connection with the writ of administrative mandate by Petitioner Rise Grass Valley, Inc. on the issue of alleged abandonment solely. Each side is permitted no more than 10 minutes in total.

6