DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV156867·alameda·Civil·Case Management
Hearing about 2 months agoThe case is ordered stayed pending binding arbitration as to the entire action.

PEREZ vs S J QUICKBITE, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, et al.

Initial Case Management Conference

Hearing date
Jul 22, 2026
Department
18
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jul 21, 2027
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffPEREZ
DefendantS J QUICKBITE, INC.

Ruling

25CV156867: PEREZ vs S J QUICKBITE, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, et al. 07/22/2026 Initial Case Management Conference in Department 18

Tentative Ruling - 07/21/2026 Patrick McKinney

ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT

The Court has ordered the following after review of the case, including timely filed Case Management Statements, without a conference.

The case is ordered stayed pending binding arbitration as to the entire action.

Post-Arbitration Status Conference is scheduled for 07/21/2027 at 01:30 PM in Department 18 at Rene C. Davidson Courthouse.

The Non-Appearance Case Review scheduled for 10/12/2026 and the Initial Case Management Conference scheduled for 07/22/2026 are vacated.

Clerk is directed to serve copies of this order, with proof of service, to counsel and to selfrepresented parties of record.

CONTESTING THE TENTATIVE CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: If the parties do not contest the Tentative Case Management Order, it will be adopted. Any party wishing to contest the tentative case management order must notify the court by email at Dept18@alameda.courts.ca.gov, and notify all opposing counsel or unrepresented parties by 4pm the day before the hearing.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share