DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
01391605·orange·Probate·Probate
Hearing about 2 months agoGRANTED

Bonner - Probate

MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL

Hearing date
Jul 15, 2026
Department
CM7
Judge
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

OtherWilliam K. Sweeney
OtherPal Lengyel-Leahu

Attorneys

William K. Sweeneyfor Administrator

Ruling

Counsel for Respondent is ordered to serve a notice of ruling and may elect to submit a proposed Order After Hearing.

01391605 Bonner - TENTATIVE RULING Probate Case: Bonner - Probate 01391605

Calendar No.: 3

Date: 07/15/2026

MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL (ROA 49)

Attorney William K. Sweeney seeks to be relieved as counsel for Administrator Pal Lengyel-Leahu.

The motion is GRANTED.

This motion is continued from 3/11/26 for compliance with California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1362 and Orange County Local Rule 601.21.

The court appreciates that counsel has served the citation. It not clear whether the client has returned the signed Notice and Acknowledgement of Receipt, which would complete the service. Nonetheless, compliance with Local Rule 601.21 is no longer required since the court appointed a new Administrator on 7/2/26.

The court notes that counsel has served all three mandatory forms (i.e., MC-051, MC-052, and MC-053) required by California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1362. (ROA 76.) The court’s records do not reflect that the Order was filed.

Counsel shall file the Order Granting Attorney’s Motion to Be Relieved – Civil (MC-053) for the court to sign and shall ensure that the client’s current or last known address is stated therein.

Withdrawal is effective upon proof of service of the signed Order Granting Attorney’s Motion to Be Relieved – Civil (MC- 053).

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share