DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV467388·santaclara·Civil·Personal Injury
Hearing about 2 months agoGRANTED

Krystal Hill vs Ronak Rahmanian et al

MOTION FOR DETERMINATION OF GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT

Hearing date
Jul 22, 2026
Department
12
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffKrystal Hill
DefendantRonak Rahmanian
DefendantL&P Aesthetics Medical, Inc.

Ruling

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 12 Honorable Nahal Iravani-Sani, Presiding Courtroom Clerk, Ryan Nguyen 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: (408) 882-2230

DATE: 07/22/2026 TIME: 9:00 A.M. and 9:01 A.M.

LINE 6 25CV467388 Krystal Hill MOTION FOR DETERMINATION OF GOOD FAITH vs Ronak Rahmanian et al SETTLEMENT

Defendant L&P Aesthetics Medical, Inc.’s motion for determination of good faith settlement. Notice is proper. No opposition received. Good cause appearing, the Defendant’s motion is GRANTED. The Settlement entered between Plaintiff and L&P Aesthetics Medical, Inc. was in good faith pursuant to CCP 877.6(b).

Defendant L&P Aesthetics Medical, Inc. to prepare the final proposed order, accompanied by the necessary Form EFS-020, within 7 days of the hearing.

LINE 7 25CV477354 Jazee Campaigns, LLC MOTION TO STAY vs Vince Thayer et al Please Ctrl Click (or scroll down to) Line 7 LINE 8 25CV480258 Shabana Pirani MOTION for DISCRETIONARY RELIEF vs Sweet Jane Kathleen Hammon Please Ctrl Click (or scroll down to) Line 8

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share