REVIEW – 1ST YEAR
v. Super. Ct. (2020) 57 Cal.App.5th 441, 456.) The Court notes that, upon entry by the Court, the OSC must be served on Mr. Archer in the same manner as a summons. (See Code Civ. Proc. §§ 1015, 1016 (statutory provisions for service of motions do not apply to service of any paper to bring a party into contempt); see also Cedars-Sinai Imaging Medical Group v. Super. Ct. (2000) 83 Cal.App.4th 1281, 1286-87 [“[u]nless the citee has concealed himself from the court, he must be personally served with the affidavit and the order to show cause; otherwise, the court lacks jurisdiction to proceed”].)
**at 9:30 a.m.** Mark Andrews v. Richard Rockwell et al 24CV000304
DEFENDANT ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR CO. OF SAN FRANCISCO, LLC’S MOTION TO STRIKE THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEMURRER
TENTATIVE RULING: The Court has been informed that the parties stipulated to a continuance of the present matter to coincide with the pending Ex Parte Hearing in this matter. As such, the matter is CONTINUED to Friday, July 24, 2026, at 11:30 a.m. in Dept. A.
PROBATE CALENDAR – Hon. Joseph J. Solga, Dept. B (Historic Courthouse) at 8:30 a.m.
Estate of George W Turner 25PR000048
STATUS HEARING RE: FINAL DISTRIBUTION
APPEARANCE REQUIRED. There is no new Status Report on file. Petitioner is therefore directed to appear and update the Court on the status of the case.
Conservatorship of Joaquin Sebastian Reynaldo 25PR000065
REVIEW – 1ST YEAR
TENTATIVE RULING: The matter is CONTINUED to August 19, 2026, at 8:30 a.m. in Dept. B to allow the Conservators to file: Care Plan (Judicial Council form GC-355/356). The Clerk is directed to send notice to the parties, along with a copy of this Minute Order.
Conservatorship of James R. Gill 25PR000132
REVIEW – 1ST YEAR
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
3