| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
Case Management Conference
Appearance required by Plaintiff to show cause as to why Plaintiff should not be sanctioned $250 or this case dismissed as to the two still unserved named defendants for failure to timely serve the Summons and Complaint in this matter on said defendants. As to the CMC, no appearances are required. The case is not at issue. Accordingly, the CMC is continued on the Court’s own motion to April 17, 2026 at 9:00 a.m. in Dept. A.
13. CU0002068 Tahoe Rose Inc. v. Alison Lee Appearances are required. Plaintiff shall show cause why sanctions should not be issued or this matter dismissed for failing to file a Substitution of Attorney or Notice of Representation or provide an update on the status of obtaining representation as ordered by this Court on November 21, 2025. The Court also desires a status update as to this matter as no Answer has been filed, and both parties continue to ignore the mandate of filing a Case Management Conference Statement.
14. CU0002143 Joan Donaldson vs. Albertsons Companies, Inc., et al. No appearances are required. On its own motion, the Court continues the case management conference to April 17, 2026, at 9:00 a.m., in Department A. The Court admonishes Plaintiff for failing to file a request for dismissal as to Defendant Hilbers as was indicated would be done on January 26, 2026 and orders such to be filed forthwith. In the event said defendant is no longer being dismissed, then Hilbers shall file an Answer or Plaintiff shall seek entry of default as to this defendant prior to the next CMC. Plaintiff shall give notice of the continued case management conference date.
Additionally, Plaintiff failed to timely file a case management conference statement let alone any statement. Plaintiff is ordered to timely file case management conference statements in the future. Failure to do so will result in the Court issuing an order to show cause re: sanctions in the amount of $250.00. The Court reserves jurisdiction to consider the instant failure in conjunction with any future failure to file a CMC Statement.
15. CU0002187 MA Construction, et al. v. Jingwen Li, et al. Appearance required by Plaintiff to advise as to the status of the case. The Court notes a hearing is set for March 9, 2026 yet believes this hearing is set in error and intends to clarify its purpose at the CMC. This case has already been deemed ripe for dismissal pursuant to CCP section 583.420.
16. CU0002278 EDC Builders, Inc. vs. Highlands Resort Condominium Association, Inc. Appearances required. The Court wishes to inquire as to venue of this matter as it appears to the Court proper venue is Placer County.
17. CU0002287 Kimberly Faggianelli, et al. vs. Michael Gardner, et al. No appearances are required. The case is at issue. The Court sets jury trial and related dates as follows:
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Trial: February 3, 4, 5, 10, 11, 12, 2027 at 8:30 a.m. each day, Dept. A PTC: January 5, 2027 at 1:30 p.m., Dept. A
MSC: November 25, 2026 at 9:00 a.m., Dept. A (See, LR 4.02)
A pre-trial order shall issue. Unless a party objects to this tentative ruling, gives notice of said objection and appears for CMC, parties are deemed to have waived notice of trial AND asserted they will waive conflict at the MSC allowing the trial judge to conduct the MSC.
18. CU0002291 John Robert Peterson vs. Margaret A.H. Ove, et al. No appearances are required. On the Court’s motion, the case management conference is continued to May 15, 2026 at 9:00 a.m., in Department A to permit additional time for the parties to continue with their settlement efforts.