DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
FL 1802914·marin·FamilyLaw·Child Support
Hearing about 2 months agoGRANTED

Crystal C. Ramirez v. Juan Carlos Ruiz De La Torre

Request for Order - Child Support

Hearing date
Jul 21, 2026
Department
G
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Causes of action

Monetary amounts referenced

$765

Parties

PetitionerCrystal C. Ramirez
RespondentJuan Carlos Ruiz De La Torre

Ruling

SUPERIOR COURT OF MARIN COUNTY OF MARIN DATE: 7/21/26 TIME: 9:00 A.M. DEPT: G CASE NO: FL 1802914

PRESIDING: HON. MATTHEW A. SIROKA

REPORTER: CLERK: J. CHARIFA

PETITIONER: CRYSTAL C. RAMIREZ

and

RESPONDENT: JUAN CARLOS RUIZ DE LA TORRE

NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS: REQUEST FOR ORDER – CHILD SUPPORT

This matter is before the Court on Respondent/Father’s April 01, 2026 Request for Order (RFO) for a modification to child support orders regarding the parties’ son, Jeancarlos (DOB: 09/21/2011). Petitioner/Mother was personally served, and she has not filed a response. The parties’ May 29, 2019 Dissolution Judgment ordered Father to pay $765 in child support. The matter was heard on June 9, 2026. Both parties were present in person and had a Spanish language interpreter. The Court set child support at zero effective April 1, 2026, referred the parties to the Legal Self Help Center for assistance with submitting the financial documents (as required by MCR Fam 7.13) by July 10, 2026, stated it would continue to utilize zero income for Mother unless the Court received additional information, and set the matter for further hearing.

Neither party submitted additional information.

The Court will use the following information to calculate guideline child support: • Zero income for Mother • Zero income for Father • 28% timeshare for Father.

Based on the foregoing information, child support is set at zero, effective April 1, 2026, and continuing until further court order, until the child marries, dies, is emancipated, reaches age 19, or reaches age 18 and is not a full-time high school student, whichever occurs first. See attached XSpouse calculation.

As authorized by CRC Rule 5.125, the Court shall prepare the formal Findings and Order After Hearing.

ramirez v de la torre.xsp Xspouse 2026-1-CA

Fixed Shares Father Mother Monthly figures Cash Flow #of children 0 1 2026 Guideline Proposed % time with NCP 28.00 % 0.00 % Comb. net spendable 0 0 Filing status SINGLE HH/MLA GUIDELINE Percent change 0% 0% # exemptions 1 * 2 * Nets(adjusted) Father Wages+salary 0 0 Father 0 Payment cost/benefit 0 0 Self-employed income 0 0 Mother 0 Net spendable income 0 0 Other taxable income 0 0 Total 0 Change from guideline 0 0 TANF+CS received 0 0 Support Other nontaxble income 0 0 Addons % of combined spendable 0% 0% 0 New spouse income 0 0 Guideln CS % of saving over guideline 0% 0% 0 401(k) employee contrib 0 0 Total taxes 0 0 Marin SS 0 Adjustments to income 0 0 Dep. exemption value 0 0 Total 0 SS paid prev marriage 0 0 # withholding allowances 0 0 CS range: 0-0 CS paid prev marriage 0 0 Net wage paycheck 0 0 Health insurance 0 0 Mother Other medical expense 0 0 Payment cost/benefit 0 0 Property tax expense 0 0 Net spendable income 0 0 Ded interest expense 0 0 Proposed Change from guideline 0 0 Charitable contributions 0 0 Tactic 9 % of combined spendable 0% 0% Misc tax deductions 0 0 CS 0 % of saving over guideline 0% 0% Qual bus income ded 0 0 SS 0 Required union dues 0 0 Total Total taxes 0 0 0 Mandatory retirement 0 0 Dep. exemption value 0 0 Hardship deduction 0 * 0 * Saving 0 # withholding allowances 0 0 Other GDL deductions 0 0 Releases 0 Net wage paycheck 0 0 Child care expenses 0 0

FC 4055 checking: ON Per Child Information Timeshare cce(F) cce(M) Addons Payor Basic CS Payor Pres CS Payor All children 28 - 72 0 0 0 Father 0 Father 0 Father

Jeancarlos 28 - 72 0 0 0 Father 0 Father 0 Father

Time: 11:12:10 Superior Court of California Date: 07/15/26 County of Marin

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share