Plaintiffs’ Motion for Relief After Judgment
JULY 22, 2026 LAW AND MOTION CALENDAR Judge NICOLE S. HEALY, DEPARTMENT 28 ________________________________________________________________________ Case Title / Nature of Case 02:00 PM LINE 1 19-CIV-00851 NORMAN PICKER, JR, ET AL. VS. KATHERINE LOUDD, ET AL.
NORMAN PICKER CHRISTOPHER J. KELLY KATHERINE LOUDD BRIAN A. BARNHORST
Plaintiffs’ Motion for Relief After Judgment
TENTATIVE RULING:
The parties are reminded that exhibits must be properly bookmarked. That is, “electronic exhibits must include electronic bookmarks with links to the first page of each exhibit and with bookmark titles that identify the exhibit number or letter and briefly describe the exhibit.” (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1110(f)(4); see also San Mateo County Superior Court, L.R. 3.3 [“Failure to bookmark exhibits to electronically filed documents may result in rejection of the party’s efiling by the Clerk of the Court or in continuance of the hearing by the Court on the related motion.”].)
The parties’ proposals and counter-proposals are too extensive for the court to address at this time. The parties are ORDERED TO APPEAR so that the court may specially-set a hearing on the motion.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”