Motion to deem the truth of matters admitted; Motion to compel responses to form interrogatories; Motion to compel responses to special interrogatories; Motion for production of documents; Request for monetary sanctions
Case: Bruno v. Estrada Dominguez Case No. CV2025-3324 Hearing Date: July 21, 2026 Department Fourteen 9:00 a.m.
Plaintiff Ray Steven Bruno’s motions to deem the truth of the matters admitted, compel responses to form interrogatories, special interrogatories, and for production of documents, as to defendants Marco Antonio Melendrez and Hilda Florencia Estrada Dominguez are DENIED AS MOOT. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 2030.290, subd. (b), 2031.300, subd. (b), 2033.280, subd. (b).) On July 8, 2026, defendants served verifications to plaintiff’s request for admissions, form interrogatories, special interrogatories, and requests for production of documents. (Turner decls. ISO amended opposition, ¶¶ 1-2, Exhibit A.)
Plaintiff’s requests for monetary sanctions against defendants are GRANTED IN PART, in the amount of $5,030.00. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 2023.010, subd. (d), 2030.290, subd. (c), 2031.300, subd. (c), 2033.280, subd. (c); Gregg decls., ¶¶ 13-14.) The Court declines to award sanctions for time not yet incurred. The sanctions shall be paid by no later than August 21, 2026.
If no hearing is requested, this tentative ruling is effective immediately. No formal order pursuant to California Rule of Court 3.1312, or further notice is required.
2 of 5
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”