DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
23CV416289·santaclara·Civil·Civil
Hearing about 2 months agoUNOPPOSED and GRANTED.

A & S Enterprises, LLC et al vs MELISSA KOZAR et al

Withdraw as attorney (multiple)

Hearing date
Jul 22, 2026
Department
16
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffA & S Enterprises, LLC
PlaintiffAlan Hammond
DefendantMELISSA KOZAR

Attorneys

BROWN GEE & WENGER, LLP(BROWN GEE & WENGER, LLP)for Plaintiff

Ruling

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 16 Honorable William J. Monahan, Presiding (covering this calendar for Judge Parrett) Courtroom Clerk, 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: (408) 882-2270

DATE: 7/22/2026 TIME: 9:00 A.M. and 9:01 A.M.

LINE 10 26CV484023 City of San Jose et al vs Motion: Order Cheryl Lam et al to Approve Receiver's April 2026 Report and Payment of Receiver's Fees and Expenses by Receiver Gerard Keena

Ctrl Click on Line 10 for ruling. The moving party shall prepare the order for signature by the court. 9:01 AM 23CV416289 A & S Enterprises, LLC et Motion: Withdraw as attorney Line 1 al vs MELISSA KOZAR et al By BROWN GEE & WENGER, LLP as counsel for Plaintiff A & S Enterprises, LLC

UNOPPOSED and GRANTED.

The court will sign the proposed order submitted on 6/29/2026 at 11:45pm. (Note: It will add a comma and LLP to the name of firm in No. 1.) 9:01 AM A & S Enterprises, LLC et Motion: Withdraw as attorney Line 2 23CV416289 al vs MELISSA KOZAR et al By BROWN GEE & WENGER, LLP as counsel for Plaintiff/Cross Defendant Alan Hammond, individually and as trustee

UNOPPOSED and GRANTED. The court will sign the proposed order submitted on 6/29/2026 at 11:45pm.

- oo0oo -

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share