Petition for Approval of Twenty-Third Account and Report of Trustee and for Trustee Fees
Matter of The Patrick Family 1992 Revocable Trust (G) 26-21326
PETITION FOR APPROVAL OF TWENTY-THIRD ACCOUNT AND REPORT OF TRUSTEE AND FOR TRUSTEE FEES
TENTATIVE RULING: The petition is GRANTED, including fees as prayed.
In The Matter of Irrevocable Trust Agreement 26PR000122 dated December 28, 1976 fbo Meredith Mateo and Irrevocable Trust Agreement dated December 29, 1976 Fbo Meredith Mateo
PETITION FOR INSTRUCTIONS TO COMBINE SIMILAR TRUSTS
TENTATIVE RULING: Good cause appearing, and no opposition being on file, the Petition is GRANTED.
CIVIL LAW & MOTION CALENDAR – Hon. Cynthia P. Smith, Dept. A (Historic Courthouse) at 8:30 a.m.
Monica Regalado et al v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. 22CV001602
[1] DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF PLAINTIFF’ S VEHICLE FOR INSPECTION
TENTATIVE RULING: The motion is GRANTED.
The moving party failed to include in the notice of this motion proper notice of the Court’s tentative ruling system as required by Local Rule 2.9. Moving party is directed to immediately provide, by telephone call AND email, the missing notice to opposing party/ies forthwith. The requirements for requesting oral argument under Local Rule 2.9 remain in effect. However, the Court may grant belated requests for oral argument or continuance of hearing, made by any party who represents it did not timely receive the required notice, regardless of whether or not moving party is present at the hearing.
Defendant American Honda Motor Co., Inc. (AHM) moves, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure sections 2031.310 and 2023.010, for an order compelling Plaintiff to produce the subject vehicle for inspection.
There appears to be no dispute regarding the following. AHM noticed an inspection of the subject vehicle for a unilaterally chosen date and location. Plaintiffs objected to the date of
2
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”