DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
VCU312956·tulare-civil·Civil·Civil
Hearing about 2 months agoThe Court will set a status conference for July 29, 2027; 8:30 am; D1.

Arroyo, Nayeli vs. Cigna Health and Life Insurance Company

Hearing re: Final Distribution

Hearing date
Jul 16, 2026
Department
1
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jul 29, 2027

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$30,097.62

Parties

PlaintiffNayeli Arroyo
DefendantCigna Health and Life Insurance Company

Ruling

Case No.: VCU312956 Date: July 16, 2026 Time: 8:30 A.M. Dept. 1-The Honorable David C. Mathias Motion: Hearing re: Final Distribution Tentative Ruling: On June 30, 2026, the settlement administrator, through its case manager, filed a declaration indicating that the deadline to cash settlement award checks was June 8, 2026, that a total of $30,097.62 remains uncashed and that "Per the State Controller's Office of Unclaimed Property - Dormancy Period, Apex shall hold the uncashed funds for one (1) year from the check-cashing deadline date, at which point Apex will then be able to transmit the unclaimed amounts in the Aggrieved Employee's name.

Apex estimated all unclaimed property from this settlement shall be distributed to the State in approximately June 2027." Therefore, the Court will set a status conference for July 29, 2027; 8:30 am; D1 as to the distribution of the $30,097.62 to the State Controller's Office. If no one requests oral argument, under Code of Civil Procedure section 1019.5(a) and California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312(a), no further written order is necessary. The minute order adopting this tentative ruling will become the order of the court and service by the clerk will constitute notice of the order.

Court reporters are usually not available for law and motion matters in the civil division. The parties and counsel must provide their own reporter if they want a transcript of the proceedings. Re: Serrano, Rosa Maria vs. The Villa Park Orchards Association

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share