| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Date |
|---|
Seventh Account and Report of Conservator; Petition for its settlement; for approval of conservator’s and attorneys’ fees and costs advanced; and for reduction of bond
PROBATE CALENDAR – Hon. Cynthia P. Smith, Dept. A (Historic Courthouse) at 8:30 a.m.
Conservatorship of Amos Neil Boykin 24PR000194
SEVENTH ACCOUNT AND REPORT OF CONSERVATOR; PETITION FOR ITS SETTLEMENT; FOR APPROVAL OF CONSERVATOR’S AND ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS ADVANCED; AND FOR REDUCTION OF BOND
TENTATIVE RULING: The Court hereby appoints the Napa County Public Defender to represent the Conservatee. Should Conservator desire to have different counsel appointed, she may request oral argument, pursuant to Local Rule 2.9, and prepare, for the Court’s signature, a proposed order appointing alternative counsel.
The matter is CONTINUED to June 10, 2026, at 8:30 a.m. in Dept. A to permit the Court Investigator to conduct a review and submit a Report.
In The Matter of Jose Estrada Cruz 25PR000312
REVIEW HEARING: STATUS OF FILING MC-356
APPEARANCE REQUIRED. The purpose of this hearing is to confirm petitioner’s filing of the “Receipt and Acknowledgement of Order for the Deposit of Money Into Blocked Account (form MC-356)” following the Court’s order approving the compromise of claim for a minor and order to deposit funds in a blocked account. The matter has been continued twice to allow more time for Petitioner to file the MC-356 form. However, there is still no MC-356 form on file. Thus, appearances are required to explain the ongoing delay.
CIVIL LAW & MOTION CALENDAR – Hon. Cynthia P. Smith, Dept. A (Historic Courthouse) at 8:30 a.m.
Mark Andrews v. Richard Rockwell et al 24CV000304
DEFENDANT ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR OF SAN FRANCISCO CO., LLC’S MOTION TO STRIKE AND DEMURRER
TENTATIVE RULING: The motion and demurrer are MOOT.
The moving party failed to include in the notice of this motion proper notice of the Court’s tentative ruling system as required by Local Rule 2.9. Moving party is directed to immediately provide, by telephone call AND email, the missing notice to opposing party/ies forthwith. The requirements for requesting oral argument under Local Rule 2.9 remain in effect. However, the Court may grant belated requests for oral argument or continuance of
2
Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.