DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
S-CV-0054481·placer·Civil·Probate
Hearing 2 months agoGRANTED

Phillips, Torah v. Dupont, Andrew

Petition for Approval of Compromise of Claim of Proceeds of Judgment for Minor

Hearing date
Jun 30, 2026
Department
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffTorah Phillips
DefendantAndrew Dupont

Ruling

administrator. The court also incorporates by reference all findings and orders set forth in the Proposed Order submitted on April 17, 2026.

The final approval hearing is scheduled for January 5, 2027 at 8:30 a.m. in Department 32. The motion for final approval shall be filed and served in accordance with Code of Civil Procedure section 1005(b).

13. S-CV-0054481 Phillips, Torah v. Dupont, Andrew

Petition for Approval of Compromise of Claim of Proceeds of Judgment for Minor

The petition for approval of minor’s compromise claim is granted. After careful consideration of the petition and attachments, the court finds the settlement is in the best interest of the minor. (Prob. Code, § 3500; Code Civ. Proc., § 372; Pearson v. Superior Court (2012) 202 Cal.App.4th 1333, 1337-38.)

14. S-CV-0055110 Taylor, Alexandria v. K-Love Inc.

Moving party is advised the notice of motion must include notice of the court’s tentative ruling procedures. (Local Rule 20.2.3(C).)

Demurrer to First Amended Complaint

Judicial Notice

Defendants’ request judicial notice of the following in support of the demurrer:

1. Plaintiff’s original complaint filed on April 23, 2025, which is attached as Exhibit A.

2. The amended and restated articles of incorporation of Educational Media Foundation, establishing itself and K-Love as religious corporations not organized for the private gain of any person, which is on file with California Secretary of State and is attached as Exhibit B.

Defendants’ request for judicial notice is granted.

Request for Statement of Decision

Defendants’ request for a statement of decision is denied. A ruling on a demurrer is not a trial of a question of fact. (See Code Civ. Proc. § 632.) Nor does the court’s ruling constitute an order or judgment in a matter involving a petition to compel arbitration. (See Code Civ. Proc. § 1291.)

9

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share