DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
2026PRLE065259·ventura·Probate·Probate
Hearing about 2 months agoGRANTED; The court intends to grant the petition and appoint Megan Smith and Zachary Smith as Limited conservators of the person and estate of Isaac Leland Smith.

IN THE MATTER OF ISAAC LELAND SMITH

Amended Petition for Appointment of Limited Conservator of the Person and Estate

Hearing date
Jul 17, 2026
Department
J6
Judge
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

OtherIsaac Leland Smith
PetitionerMegan Smith
PetitionerZachary Smith

Ruling

2026PRLE065259: IN THE MATTER OF ISAAC LELAND SMITH 07/17/2026 in Department J6 Hearing on Amended Petition for Appointment of Limited Conservator of the Person and Estate

The court intends to appoint counsel for the proposed conservatee.

The court intends to grant the petition and appoint Megan Smith and Zachary Smith (parents) request appointment as Limited conservator of the person and estate of Isaac Leland Smith with all seven limited powers (See #1.h.) with bond to be determined after filing the I&A.

As to the requested Probate Code §2591 powers, petitioners have not shown that granting the requested powers “under the circumstances of the particular guardianship or conservatorship, it would be to the advantage, benefit, and best interest of the estate to do so.” (Probate Code §2590)

As to the request for the power to sell the conservatee’s personal residence, petitioners allege the proposed conservatee has zero assets.

Set due dates for care plans, I&A, and due date and hearing date for annual status report and first account and report.

The clerk shall give notice.

1

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share