Phillips vs. Newport-Mesa School District

entity. To the extent City of Moorpark v. Superior Court (1998) 18 Cal.4th 1143 allowed a wrongful termination claim based on disability discrimination to proceed against a public entity, the California Supreme Court noted “the question of a public entity’s tort immunity under section 815 was not raised in that case. ‘It is axiomatic that cases are not authority for propositions not considered.’” (Miklosy v. Regents of University of California (2008) 44 Cal.4th 876, 900, fn. 7, citing People v. Ault (2004) 33 Cal.4th 1250, 1268, fn. 10.) Plaintiff did not identify any other statute to support Plaintiff’s contention that Plaintiff will be able to amend this cause of action to properly allege a cause of action for wrongful termination against Defendant, a public entity.

Accordingly, Defendant’s motion is granted without leave to amend.

Defendant shall give notice.

7 Navarro vs. FCA US LLC

2025-01486633 1. Demurrer to Amended Complaint 2. Motion to Strike Complaint 3. Case Management Conference

Off Calendar 8 Phillips vs. Newport-Mesa School District

2025-01474929 Motion to Compel Further Responses to Special Interrogatories Motion to Compel Production Motion to Compel Response to Requests for Admissions

Plaintiff Trenae Phillips’ motion for order compelling defendant Newport-Mesa School District to provide further responses to requests for production, set one (“RFPs”) is substantively moot given the parties’ agreement on supplemental responses after further meeting and conferring. No sanctions are awarded.

Plaintiff’s motion to compel defendant Corey Stone to provide further responses to requests for admission, set one (“RFAs”) is substantively moot given the parties’ agreement on supplemental responses after further meeting and conferring. Plaintiff is awarded sanctions of $960 against Defendant Stone.

Plaintiff’s motion to compel Defendant Stone to provide further responses to special interrogatories, set one, is substantively moot given the parties’ agreement on supplemental responses after further meeting and conferring. Plaintiff is awarded sanctions of $480.