DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV481915·santaclara·Civil·Civil / Pro Hac Vice
Hearing about 2 months agoGRANTED

Keep America Safe and Beautiful v. Flex-Tech Hosing & Tubing, LLC

Pro Hac Vice Counsel

Hearing date
Jul 8, 2026
Department
12
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffKeep America Safe and Beautiful
DefendantFlex-Tech Hosing & Tubing, LLC

Attorneys

Scott R. Schillingsfor Defendant

Ruling

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 12 Honorable Nahal Iravani-Sani, Presiding Courtroom Clerk, Ryan Nguyen 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: (408) 882-2230

DATE: 07/08/2026 TIME: 9:00 A.M. and 9:01 A.M.

9:01 CASE # CASE TITLE RULING LINE 1 24CV450008 Daniel Duran vs Motion to Withdraw as Attorney General Motors LLC Plaintiff’s Counsel David Derderian of Prestige Legal Solutions, P.C. Motion to Withdraw at Attorney

Trial in this matter is scheduled for next week July 13, 2026. Trial assignment is July 9, 2026. Plaintiff and Counsel are both ordered to appear at the July 8, 2026 Motion to Withdraw hearing at 9:00 a.m. (remote appearance acceptable.)

Plaintiff’s failure to appear may result in dismissal of the case.

LINE 2 25CV481915 Keep America Safe and Hearing: Pro Hac Vice Counsel Beautiful vs Flex-Tech Hosing & Tubing, LLC Defendant Flex-tech Hosing & Tubing, LLC’s Application for Scott R. Schillings to appear pro hac vice pursuant to California Rules of Court Rule 9.40. Notice is proper. No opposition filed.

Good cause appearing, the application is GRANTED. The court will sign the previously e-filed proposed order.

- oo0oo -

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share