Home Loan Eagle, Inc. v. Jordon Trigg et al.
Motion to compel discovery responses and deem admissions admitted
Motion type
Monetary amounts referenced
Parties
Attorneys
Ruling
SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 12 Honorable Nahal Iravani-Sani, Presiding Courtroom Clerk, Ryan Nguyen 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: (408) 882-2230
DATE: 07/08/2026 TIME: 9:00 A.M. and 9:01 A.M.
LINE 7 25CV478158 Home Loan Eagle, Inc. Motion: Compel vs Jordon Trigg et al. Plaintiff’s motion to compel discovery responses and deem admissions admitted, filed March 13, 2026. Plaintiff has demonstrated that Requests for Admissions were properly served, the time to respond has expired, and no response has been served on propounding party.
Notice is proper. The Court has received no opposition from Defendant. “[T]he failure to file an opposition creates an inference that the motion or demurrer is meritorious.” (Sexton v. Superior Court (1997) 58 Cal.App.4th 1403, 1410.)
Good cause appearing, the motion is GRANTED. The truth of all specified facts in the Request for Admissions, Set One, propounded by Plaintiff on Defendant on January 12, 2026, shall be deemed admitted.
Sanctions are GRANTED in the amount of $1,487.50 (2 hours @ $595.00 for attorney James Roberts’ reasonable fees) pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure 2023.030.
Plaintiff to prepare the final order that repeats the admissions to be admitted verbatim, accompanied by the necessary Forms EFS-020, within 7 days of the date of the hearing.
LINE 8 26CV483739 Yen Lucero Motion to Expunge Lis Pendens vs Ha Dao et al. Please CTRL click (or scroll down to) Line 8
LINE 9 26CV484025 Rubin Zou Hearing: Demurrer vs Amazon.com, Inc. et al. Please CTRL click (or scroll down to) Line 9
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”