DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24CV443623·santaclara·Civil·Contract
Hearing about 2 months agoGRANTED

Riley’s Remodeling & Design, Inc. v. Joseph Shaw et al

Motion for Leave to File Cross-Complaint

Hearing date
Jul 8, 2026
Department
12
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffRiley’s Remodeling & Design, Inc.
DefendantJoseph Shaw

Ruling

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 12 Honorable Nahal Iravani-Sani, Presiding Courtroom Clerk, Ryan Nguyen 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: (408) 882-2230

DATE: 07/08/2026 TIME: 9:00 A.M. and 9:01 A.M.

LINE 3 24CV443623 Riley's Remodeling & Motion for Leave to File Cross-Complaint Design, Inc. vs. Defendants’ motion for Leave to File Cross Complaint, field Joseph Shaw et al 1/23/26. Notice is proper. The Court has received no opposition from Plaintiff. “[T]he failure to file an opposition creates an inference that the motion or demurrer is meritorious.” (Sexton v. Superior Court (1997) 58 Cal.App.4th 1403, 1410.)

Good Cause Appearing, Defendants’ motion is GRANTED.

Defendant to prepare the final order, accompanied by Form EFS-020, within 7 days of the date of the hearing.

LINE 4 25CV457958 John Susino Demurrer vs. Safeway Inc. et al Defendants’ Demurrer to Plaintiff’s Complaint is Unopposed and Sustained with 15 days leave to amend.

LINE 5 25CV462561 Jane Doe vs Hearing: Demurrer Wanderlust Trust et al Please CTRL click (or scroll down to) Line 5 LINE 6 25CV471073 John Doe L.M., an Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel compliance with subpoenas for individual, vs Craig production of business records Chandler et al Please scroll down to Line 6

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share