DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CV2026-0396·yolo·Civil·Contract
Hearing about 2 months agoOVERRULED

Compass Club, LLC et al. v. Webb et al.

demurrer

Hearing date
Jul 16, 2026
Department
Fourteen
Judge
Prevailing
Opposing Party
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffCompass Club, LLC
PlaintiffCompass Leaf, LLC
DefendantJames Webb
DefendantMelissa Webb

Ruling

Case: Compass Club, LLC et al. v. Webb et al. Case No. CV2026-0396 Hearing Date: July 16, 2026 Department Fourteen 9:00 a.m.

Defendants James Webb and Melissa Webb’s (collectively, “defendants”) demurrer to plaintiffs Compass Club, LLC and Compass Leaf, LLC’s first amended complaint is OVERRULED. (Code Civ. Proc., § 430.10.) The Court finds that defendants: (1) failed to file a notice of hearing as required by California Rules of Court, rules 3.1112(a) and 3.1320(c); (2) failed to state in separate paragraphs each ground of the demurrer and whether it applies to the entire complaint or specified causes of action as required by California Rules of Court, rule 3.1320(a); and (3) failed to file a meet and confer declaration as required by Code of Civil Procedure section 430.41(a)(3.)

As the Court is overruling the demurrer on procedural grounds, the Court need not rule on plaintiffs’ request for judicial notice ISO opposition.

Defendants have by no later than July 27, 2026, to answer or otherwise plead to plaintiffs first amended complaint. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1320(j).)

The notice of demurrer does not provide notice of this Court’s tentative ruling system as required by Local Rule 11.2(b). Counsel for demurring party, or the demurring party if unrepresented by counsel, is ordered to notify the opposing party or parties immediately of the tentative ruling system.

If no hearing is requested, and no party appears at the hearing, this tentative ruling is effective immediately. No formal order pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312 or further notice is required.

3 of 6

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share