Request for continuing the CHRO's issued
Case Number
Case Type Civil Law & Motion Hearing Date / Time Wed, 05/27/2026 - 10:00 Nature of Proceedings Request for continuing the CHRO's issued Tentative Ruling Person to Be Protected: Deja Rabb["Deja"] Person to Be Restrained: Natalie Urik ["Natalie"]
The Court has no ruling until the matter is heard in the courtroom. The Declaration of Deja and Natalie are admitted into evidence. The Court will hear any and all testimony and then will rule.
Analysis
This request for a Civil Harassment Restraining Order was filed 5/5/26. Description of most recent incident of harassment: Natalie and I have children in the same school. My daughter and her daughter are in the same Girl Scout troop. She has recently become upset because she feels like my daughter has not done enough work on a shared Girl Scout project. This "dispute" has been escalating for a period of many months. It's to the point where she will not let my daughter go to the bathroom at Girl Scout meetings, she berates my daughter in front of others at school, she tries to bully my daughter into kicking, she berates me to my daughter, and all this is very upsetting to my daughter.
This behavior of Natalie's has been going since October 2025. The school has even told her not to speak to children that are not her own. So now she comes to the Girl Scout meetings to harass my daughter. She filmed my daughter's presentation (that her daughter wasn't even in) without my permission and then she chased both my daughter and her friend out of the meeting while calling them liars and thieves. She has confronted other parents as well. At a later presentation, she returned and began asking many non-relevant and harassing questions of the girls like "how many hours did you put in?" and "show us proof."
These are not presentations in which parents are supposed to participate. And it certainly is not a forum for Natalie to harass my daughter. We both wish to be left alone. My daughter is very upset to the point of getting stomach aches and not wanting to go to school. It's become a source of toxic stress for her.
Temporary Restraining Orders Filed 5/6/26. Protected Person: Deja. Restrained Person: Natalie Additional protected people: Colette Maxine Rabb-Courson age 12 Gardner Boomrok Rabb-Courson age 10 Granted as follows: (1) Personal Conduct Orders; (2) Stay-Away Order [20 yards]. Set to expire 5/27/26.
Response Filed by Natalie Filed 5/18/26: Testifies that: I do not agree with the TROs. On March 12, 2026, I ended all communication with Deja Rabb via email. On May 11, 2026 I learned that she had filed a restraining order against me. The allegations are confusing to me and do not align with my understanding of the events. In order to provide context and address these allegations, I will begin from the start of the Girl Scout Silver Award project, which I began
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”