DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
FDI-25-801799·sf·FamilyLaw·Contempt
Hearing 2 months agoArraignment

Jenna Rose Nicoletti Williams v. Reagan Boyd Williams

Order to Show Cause and Affidavit for Contempt

Hearing date
Jun 18, 2026
Department
404
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PetitionerJenna Rose Nicoletti Williams
RespondentReagan Boyd Williams

Ruling

1 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 4

5) 6 JENNA ROSE NICOLETTI WILLIAMS,) Case Number: FDI-25-801799) 7 Petitioner) Hearing Date: June 18, 2026) 8 VS.) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM) 9 REAGAN BOYD WILLIAMS,) Department: 404) 10 Respondent) Presiding: CINDEE MAYFIELD) 11) 12 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND AFFIDAVIT FOR CONTEMPT 13 TENTATIVE RULING 14

15 The parties are ordered to appear in person or by Zoom for arraignment of Father. If a party 16 chooses to appear by Zoom, that party must abide by the Notice and Instructions for Remote 17 Appearance in San Francisco Family Court set forth above. 18

19 1) On for hearing is Petitioner Jenna Nicoletti Williams (Mother)’s Order to Show Cause Re: Contempt 20 filed 4/10/2026. Mother alleges that Respondent Reagan Williams (Father) has failed to make several 21 Court-ordered child support and temporary spousal support payments and failed to provide his 2025 22 W2 and paystubs for the period 9/15/2025 – 12/31/2025 by the Court-ordered deadline. 23 2) Per the Proof of Service filed 5/26/2026, Father was personally served with the Order to Show Cause 24 Re: Contempt on 5/21/2026. 25 3) Father has filed no pleadings responding to the Order to Show Cause Re: Contempt. 26

29

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share