DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC21596771·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing about 2 months agoOFF CALENDAR

MHYF HOLDINGS, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY ET AL VS. CHRIS V. KELLY ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion For Determination Of Good Faith Settlement

Hearing date
Jul 15, 2026
Department
501
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffMHYF HOLDINGS, LLC
PlaintiffMATTHEW HUMPHREY
PlaintiffYING FU
PlaintiffQUITE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.P.
DefendantCHRIS V. KELLY

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for Wednesday, July 15, 2026, line 3. 5-PLAINTIFF MHYF HOLDINGS, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, MATTHEW HUMPHREY, YING FU, QUITE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.P.Motion For Determination Of Good Faith Settlement. is OFF CALENDAR.

Insufficient notice per CCP 1005 and 1010.6. Additionally, Notice of Motion was not accompanied by Points and Authorities or any supporting evidence. While the Notice of Motion reference Points and Authorities and Declaration, there was no indication which document exactly it was referring to. It might have been the documents filed 4 days earlier or it could be any of the Points and Authorities or Declarations filed in this action. = (501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share