DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
2023PRDE017848·ventura·Probate·Probate
Hearing about 2 months agoDENIED in part and GRANTED in part.

IN THE MATTER OF LUCINA HERNANDEZ PASILLAS

Petition Approving Sale of Estate Property and for Instructions

Hearing date
Jul 15, 2026
Department
J6
Judge
Prevailing
Mixed
Next hearing
Sep 30, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Ruling

2023PRDE017848: IN THE MATTER OF LUCINA HERNANDEZ PASILLAS 07/15/2026 in Department J6 Hearing on Petition Approving Sale of Estate Property and for Instructions

The court intends to deny the petition in part and grant in part.

The court intends to deny the petition as to the proposed sale of the estate’s interest in the property to the executor and deny the petition as to authority to execute all documents necessary to complete the transaction. (Probate Code §9880; §9881)

The court intends to grant the petition as to the instruction to Isidro to provide documentation evidencing his claim of disproportionate contributions towards the mortgage of the Property.

Isidro to file and serve his accounting of contributions towards the mortgage of the property by 08/26/26.

As to Isidro’s requests raised in his objection. The court finds that the requests as to the administration of the property from the death of decedent onward are items which will necessarily be included in an estate account and report. As to any actions Antolino Hernandez made with respect to the property (payments, rental receipts, etc.) as an individual, objector has not filed for affirmative relief against Antolino Hernandez as individual.

The court sets an review hearing on 09/30/26 at 9:00 a.m. in Department J6.

1

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share