GROSCHUPF vs LEI CONSTRUCTION, BUSINESS ENTITY FORM UNKNOWN, et al.
Ex Parte Application for Order Specially Setting Hearing on Motion for Summary Judgment
Motion type
Parties
Attorneys
Ruling
25CV120507: GROSCHUPF vs LEI CONSTRUCTION, BUSINESS ENTITY FORM UNKNOWN, et al. 07/15/2026 Hearing on Ex Parte Application Lei Construction and Jonathan Lei Application for Order Specially Setting Hearing on Motion for Summary Judgment in Department 18
Tentative Ruling - 07/10/2026 Patrick McKinney
Defendants Lei Construction and Jonathan Lei's Ex Parte Application for an Order Specially Setting the Hearing on their Motion for Summary Judgment/Summary Adjudication is GRANTED. The motion will be heard on September 30, 2026. (Cal Code Civ. Proc. § 437c(a)(3).)
Although the court grants the application, Defendants' attempt to blame the court's reservation system or "because of the Court's congested calendar" is not well-taken. The court set this matter for trial on August 26, 2025 and Defendants could have reserved the motion for hearing anytime thereafter and indisputably before the last possible day for a hearing. Defendant's counsel asserts that her "office attempted to obtain a hearing date complying with Code of Civil Procedure," but does not state when. (Frederick Decl. para. 6.)
Additionally, the requested hearing date, September 25, 2026, is a California state holiday and, in any event, the court hears law & motion in non-asbestos complex matters on Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. Counsel are reminded that there are a limited number of reservations available for motions on any daily calendar, and the court may not be inclined to grant relief under similar circumstances in the future without a showing that counsel timely attempted to obtain a hearing date.
The Hearing on Motion for Summary Judgment filed by LEI Construction, business entity form unknown (Defendant) + CRS# 885653638192 scheduled for 09/29/2026 is reset to 09/30/2026 at 01:30 PM in Department 18 at Rene C. Davidson Courthouse.
Defendants' counsel must forthwith serve a copy of this order on all counsel of record and selfrepresented parties. The Court orders counsel to obtain a copy of this order from the eCourt portal.
CONTESTING THE TENTATIVE RULING: If the parties do not contest the tentative ruling, it will be adopted. Any party wishing to contest the tentative ruling must notify the court by email at Dept18@alameda.courts.ca.gov, and notify all opposing counsel or unrepresented parties by 4pm the day before the hearing.
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”