DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
21CV000063·alameda·Civil·Derivative Action
Hearing about 2 months agoThe Compliance Hearing nonappearance (review proposed settlement) scheduled for 07/15/2026 is vacated.

SIU vs SIU, et al.

Compliance Hearing nonappearance (review proposed settlement)

Hearing date
Jul 15, 2026
Department
25
Prevailing
Moving Party
Next hearing
Aug 5, 2026
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffSIU
DefendantSIU

Ruling

21CV000063: SIU vs SIU, et al. 07/15/2026 Compliance Hearing nonappearance (review proposed settlement) in Department 25

Tentative Ruling - 07/12/2026 Jenna Whitman

ORDER RE: CASE MANAGEMENT

The Court has ordered the following after review of the case, including timely filed Case Management Statements, without a conference.

The Court is satisfied that other potential shareholders of Roberto’s Inc., including those who are presently participating in the Hawaii Probate Proceeding (Estate of Roberto Ting Siu, Circuit Court of the First Circuit, State of Hawaii, Case P No. 17-1-000667) have received notice of the proposed settlement of derivative claims and this court's order setting a deadline for any objections. No objections have been filed, nor has the Court received any objection to the settlement via informal channels (e.g., email).

The Court is therefore inclined to sign the parties' proposed order approving the proposed settlement and maintain the 8/5/2026 hearing re: dismissal. (Should the parties require a continuance of that hearing, they should file a stipulation or ex parte application, supported by an explanation, under oath, supporting good cause.)

The Compliance Hearing nonappearance (review proposed settlement) scheduled for 07/15/2026 is vacated.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share