DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
23CECG05148·fresno·Civil·Partition/Real Property
Hearing about 2 months agoCONTINUED

Trevino v. Martinez

By Referee to Confirm Sale of Real Property

Hearing date
Jul 7, 2026
Department
403
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Aug 13, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffTrevino
DefendantMartinez

Ruling

(37) Tentative Ruling

Re: Trevino v. Martinez Superior Court Case No. 23CECG05148

Hearing Date: July 7, 2026 (Dept. 403)

Motion: By Referee to Confirm Sale of Real Property

Tentative Ruling:

To continue the matter to Thursday, August 13, 2026 at 3:30 p.m. in Department 403. The referee is to file and serve notice of the hearing and any accompanying papers no later than July 30, 2026.

Explanation:

Code of Civil Procedure section 873.720 provides for a referee to confirm sale of real property. Such requires at least 10 days’ notice to the purchaser and all other parties who have appeared in the action. (Code Civ. Proc., § 873.720, subd. (b).) Here, there is no indication that the referee provided notice of this hearing to the purchaser. The matter is continued and the referee is to provide notice to plaintiff and the purchaser of the continued hearing date. Additionally, the court is requesting a declaration from the referee addressing the decrease in the sales price from the February 19, 2026 Notice of Sale to the May 14, 2026 Notice of Sale.

Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312(a), and Code of Civil Procedure section 1019.5, subdivision (a), no further written order is necessary. The minute order adopting this tentative ruling will serve as the order of the court and service by the clerk will constitute notice of the order.

Tentative Ruling

Issued By: SMC on July 2, 2026. (Judge’s initials) (Date)

3

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share