Sada Systems vs. Pixilate

To access the courtroom, click or copy and paste this link into your internet browser and scroll to

Department 6: https://santaclara.courts.ca.gov/online-services/remote-hearings

LINE CASE NO. CASE TITLE TENTATIVE RULING 9:00 23CV418372 Muhammad Zaidi vs Plaintiff moves this court to lift stay of proceedings due to bankruptcy filings. A stay 1 William Wu, et. al. of proceedings was ordered by this court in June 28, 2024. The motion was unopposed. In that order, the court determined that DOA was an indispensable party. Plaintiff’s filing of complaint alleges the same allegations between defendant Willam Wu and DOA. Defendant William Wu appears to have acted as DOA in the contractual arrangement between himself and Plaintiff. A judgment of third defendant will in effect be a judgment against the debtor. (See A.H. Robins, Inc. vs. Piccinin, 788 F.2d 994, 999 (4th Cir. 1986). As stated in this court’s previous order, in the interests of judicial efficiency, the court has inherent power to stay proceeding. Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED.

9:00 24CV439682 JP Morgan Chase Plaintiff moves this court to deem request for admissions admitted. Defendant 2 Bank vs Oscar Zamar never answered Plaintiff’s propounded request for admissions. Defendant never filed an objection to this motion. Plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED.

9:00 24CV444671 XH Industrial Co. LTD. Defendant moves this court to retain confidentiality as to documents previously 3 Vs Capital Asset designated as confidential. Plaintiff does not appear to be prejudiced as the Exchange and documents can be reviewed unredacted by plaintiff and counsel. Should there Trading, LLC be a reason to disclose to the public such documentation, plaintiff could file such a motion. Defendant’s motion is GRANTED.

9:00 24CV455448 Schuyler Armstrong Defendant petitions this court to compel further responses to interrogatories and 4 vs. Stanford production of documents. Plaintiff’s responses does not indicate a good faith University Medical effort to obtain information sought by Defendant pursuant to CCP 2030.220(c). Center Defendant’s petition to compel is GRANTED. Defendant’s motion for $3600 in monetary sanctions is GRANTED.

9:00 25CV470405 JP Morgan Chase Plaintiff moves this court to deem request for admissions admitted. Defendant 5 Bank vs. Tara Lopez never answered Plaintiff’s propounded request for admissions. Defendant never filed an objection to this motion. Plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED

9:00 25CV477954 SIU Holdings et.al. vs. See below. 6-7 Pouya Taaghol

9:00 25CV481161 Hao Chen vs. Zhipeng See below 8 (AKA Nathan) Lu