Adorn Premiums LLC vs. J Style Premiums, LCC

terms as may be proper.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 576.) While this discretion will generally be exercised liberally to permit amendment of the pleadings, the court acts within its discretion to deny an amendment where there has been a long delay in seeking the amendment and allowing the amendment would be prejudicial to the opposing side. (See Magpali v. Farmers Group, Inc. (1996) 48 Cal.App.4th 471, 488.)

Here, Live Nation has substantially complied with the requirements of California Rules of Court, rule 3.1324.

JRM opposed Live Nation’s ex parte application seeking advancement of the hearing on the instant motion. Within that opposition, the JRM argued prejudice because of the trial date. (ROA 332.) However, in response to that argument, the Court continued the trial date to allow for additional discovery. (ROA 334.) JRM provides no further opposition.

Thus, the Motion is granted.

Live Nation shall electronically file the first amended cross- complaint within 10 days pursuant to the Code of Civil Procedure.

Live Nation shall serve notice of this Order.

4. 2023-1332366 Plaintiffs Adorn Premiums, LLC’s and Joshua Ivey’s motion to Adorn continue the trial date is denied as moot. Premiums LLC vs. J Style On 4/6/26, the Court continued trial on its own motion to Tuesday, Premiums, February 16, 2027. LCC Court orders clerk to give notice.

5. 2024-1417627 Judgment debtor Shelley Hawkins’ Claim of Exemption is granted. Sullivan vs. Hawkins Judgment Debtor claims the funds levied from her Schools First Federal Credit Union accounts are exempt. The Court has considered the Claim of Exemption, which was made under penalty of perjury, the supporting documents, and the Notice of Opposition to Claim of Exemption, and determines the claim of exemption should be granted in its entirety. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 704.190