DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25-CLJ-00490·sanmateo·Civil·Contract
Hearing about 2 months agoGRANTED

BLACK DIAMOND PAVER STONES & LANDSCAPE, INC. VS. NAOMI B. TURE, ET AL.

Motion to Change its Attorney of Record

Hearing date
Jul 15, 2026
Department
28
Prevailing
Plaintiff
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffBLACK DIAMOND PAVER STONES & LANDSCAPE, INC.
DefendantNAOMI B. TURE

Attorneys

ANTHONY J. KEILEY(Law Offices of Anthony J. Keiley, III)for Plaintiff
PATRICK J. WHITEHORN(Last, Faoro & Whitehorn)for Plaintiff
ERNEST BROWNfor Defendant

Ruling

July 15, 2026 LAW AND MOTION CALENDAR JUDGE NICOLE S. HEALY, DEPARTMENT 28 ________________________________________________________________________

02:00 PM LINE 9 25-CLJ-00490 BLACK DIAMOND PAVER STONES & LANDSCAPE, INC. VS. NAOMI B. TURE, ET AL.

BLACK DIAMOND PAVER STONES & LANDSCAPE, INC. ANTHONY J. KEILEY NAOMI B. TURE ERNEST BROWN

Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant Black Diamond Paver Stones & Landscape, Inc.’s Motion to Change its Attorney of Record

TENTATIVE RULING:

Plaintiff and cross-defendant Black Diamond Paver Stones & Landscape, Inc.’s Motion to Change its Attorney of Record is GRANTED.

Plaintiff had been represented by Anthony J. Keiley, III, Esq. (State Bar No. 104578), of the Law Offices of Anthony J. Keiley, III. Mr. Keiley has died and plaintiff seeks an order permitting it to change its attorney of record to Patrick J. Whitehorn, of Last, Faoro & Whitehorn pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure, section 284.

Mr. Keiley was a sole practitioner and had no partners or other co-counsel to take over this case upon his death or sign a substitution of counsel. (Whitehorn Decl., ¶¶ 4-5.) Mr. Whitehorn is an attorney in good standing with the State Bar of California. (Id., ¶ 1.) Plaintiff is a legal entity and cannot appear in court except through counsel. A “corporation may not proceed in propria persona.” (Thomas G. Ferruzzo, Inc. v. Superior Ct. (1980) 104 Cal.App.3d 501, 504, discussing Merco Construction Engineers, Inc. v. Mun. Ct. (1978) 21 Cal.3d 724.) The court therefore grants the motion.

If the tentative ruling is uncontested, it shall become the order of the court. Thereafter, Mr. Whitehorn shall prepare a written order consistent with the court’s ruling for the court’s signature, pursuant to California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312 and Local Rule 3.403(b)(iv), and provide written notice of the ruling to all parties who have appeared in this action. The order should be e-filed only, do not email or mail a hard copy to the court.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share