DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CV0006175·marin·Civil·Discovery
Hearing about 2 months agoCONTINUED

ALEXANDER XUE vs. ANCONA, INC.

MOTION – COMPEL – DISCOVERY FACILITATOR PROGRAM

Hearing date
Jul 15, 2026
Department
H
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jul 29, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Discovery rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffALEXANDER XUE
DefendantANCONA, INC.

Ruling

Plaintiff Alexander Xue filed a motion for compliance with his Initial Disclosures demand. The parties were referred to the Discovery Facilitator Program and on July 6, 2025, Gerri Green was appointed to serve as the Discovery Facilitator. The court will continue this motion to July 29, 2026 to allow for the Discovery Facilitation to take place. Pursuant to local rule MCR 2.13, the parties must file a Declaration of Non-Resolution if the matter does not resolve.

All parties must comply with Marin County Superior Court Local Rules, Rule 2.10(B) to contest the tentative decision. Parties who request oral argument are required to appear in person or remotely by ZOOM. Regardless of whether a party requests oral argument in accordance with Rule 2.10(B), the prevailing party shall prepare an order consistent with the announced ruling as required by Marin County Superior Court Local Rules, Rule 2.11.

The Zoom appearance information for July, 2026 is as follows: https://marin-courts-ca-gov.zoomgov.com/j/1615487764?pwd=Ob4B5J7LLKcpnkxzJjjEOSHNzEGafG.1

Meeting ID: 161 548 7764 Passcode: 502070

If you are unable to join by video, you may join by telephone by calling 1-669-254-5252 and using the above-provided passcode. Zoom appearance information may also be found on the Court’s website: marin.courts.ca.gov

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share