DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CV0005317·marin·Civil·Discovery
Hearing about 2 months agoAppearances required

ROBERT C. PLACAK & ASSOCIATES, INC. vs. DEBBY BAKER PAGE ET AL.

MOTION – COMPEL - DISCOVERY FACILITATOR PROGRAM; MOTION – COMPEL – ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES - DISCOVERY FACILITATOR PROGRAM

Hearing date
Jul 15, 2026
Department
H
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Discovery rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffROBERT C. PLACAK & ASSOCIATES, INC.
DefendantDEBBY BAKER PAGE

Ruling

2) MOTION – COMPEL – ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES - DISCOVERY FACILITATOR PROGRAM

Plaintiff filed motions to compel compliance with document production and further responses to form interrogatories, and for sanctions, which were initially set for hearing on July 8, 2026. The parties then stipulated to move the hearing to July 22, 2026 in part because the parties were working to resolve matters through the Discovery Facilitator. According to Plaintiff, Defendant had agreed to provide supplemental responses.

No further update has been provided. Appearances required.

All parties must comply with Marin County Superior Court Local Rules, Rule 2.10(B) to contest the tentative decision. Parties who request oral argument are required to appear in person or remotely by ZOOM. Regardless of whether a party requests oral argument in accordance with Rule 2.10(B), the prevailing party shall prepare an order consistent with the announced ruling as required by Marin County Superior Court Local Rules, Rule 2.11.

The Zoom appearance information for July, 2026 is as follows: https://marin-courts-ca-gov.zoomgov.com/j/1615487764?pwd=Ob4B5J7LLKcpnkxzJjjEOSHNzEGafG.1

Meeting ID: 161 548 7764 Passcode: 502070

If you are unable to join by video, you may join by telephone by calling (669) 254-5252 and using the above-provided passcode. Zoom appearance information may also be found on the Court’s website: https://www.marin.courts.ca.gov

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share