DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
PCL195930·tulare-civil·Civil·Debt Collection
Hearing about 2 months agoGRANTED

Synchrony Bank vs. Caudillo, Angel

Plaintiff's Motion to Vacate Entry of Judgment and Dismiss Case

Hearing date
Jul 14, 2026
Department
19
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffSynchrony Bank
DefendantAngel Caudillo

Ruling

Case No.: PCL195930 Date: July 14, 2026 Time: 8:30 A.M. Dept. 19-The Honorable Russell P. Burke Motion: Plaintiff's Motion to Vacate Entry of Judgment and Dismiss Case Tentative Ruling: To grant the motion and dismiss the case as requested by Plaintiff Facts and Analysis In this matter, after Plaintiff obtained default judgment, but upon review of the file has confirmed fraud occurred with respect to the account at issue and therefore requests the default and default judgment be set aside and that this case be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 473(b).

The Court, therefore, grants the motion, vacates default and default judgment and dismisses this matter. If no one requests oral argument, under Code of Civil Procedure section 1019.5(a) and California Rules of Court, rule 3.1312(a), no further written order is necessary. The minute order adopting this tentative ruling will become the order of the court and service by the clerk will constitute notice of the order. Court reporters are usually not available for law and motion matters in the civil division.

The parties and counsel must provide their own reporter if they want a transcript of the proceedings. Re: Ritchie, Rhonda vs. Karman, Timothy et al

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share