DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25PR00277·sonoma·Probate·Probate
Hearing about 2 months agoCONTINUED

Guardianship of Jazmin Carolina Martinez Zapeta

Case Management Conference

Hearing date
Jul 7, 2026
Department
61
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Apr 6, 2027
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

OtherJazmin Carolina Martinez Zapeta

Ruling

No appearances required. The required document has been received and reviewed. The matter is set for the next annual Case Management Conference at 9:00 a.m. on July 6, 2027, in Department 61 for review of compliance with the filing of the Confidential Guardianship Status Report (Judicial Council Form GC-251). If a completed GC-251 has been filed in a timely fashion prior to the court date, appearances will be waived.

21. Guardianship of Paras Khanna 25PR00268 Case Management Conference

TENTATIVE RULING: No appearances required. The ward will turn 21 years old this month and the guardianship will terminate by operation of law. The case is continued to August 4, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. for a hearing on termination of the guardianship, at which no appearances will be required.

22. Guardianship of Jazmin Carolina Martinez Zapeta 25PR00277 Case Management Conference

TENTATIVE RULING: No appearances required. The required document has been received and reviewed. The ward will turn 21 in March of next year and the guardianship will terminate by operation of law at that time. The matter is set for the next annual Case Management Conference at 9:00 a.m. on April 6, 2027, in Department 61, to address termination of the guardianship. No appearances will be required.

23. Guardianship of Shubham Shubham 25PR00290 Case Management Conference

TENTATIVE RULING: No appearances required. The ward has turned 21 years old and the guardianship has terminated by operation of law. No future court dates.

24. Guardianship of Adelene Rodriguez Vega, Carolina Rodriguez Vega, Berenice Rodriguez Vega, Victor Manuel Rodriguez Vega

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share