DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24PR00859·sonoma·Probate·Probate
Hearing about 2 months agoCONTINUED

Guardianship of Alexander John O’Neill

Case Management Conference

Hearing date
Jul 7, 2026
Department
61
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jul 6, 2027
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

OtherAlexander John O’Neill

Ruling

Guardianship Case Management Calendar (CMC) Tentative Rulings Tuesday, July 7, 2026

1. Guardianship of Zyla Neloyne Anilus 23PR00078 Case Management Conference

TENTATIVE RULING: No appearances required. The required document has been received and reviewed. The matter is set for the next annual Case Management Conference at 9:00 a.m. on May 4th, 2027, in Department 61 for review of compliance with the filing of the Confidential Guardianship Status Report (Judicial Council Form GC-251). If a completed GC-251 has been filed in a timely fashion prior to the court date, appearances will be waived.

2. Guardianship of Jade Marie Hudson, Elijah Thomas Hudson 24PR00202 Case Management Conference

TENTATIVE RULING: No appearances required. The required document has been received and reviewed. The matter is set for the next annual Case Management Conference at 9:00 a.m. on July 6, 2027, in Department 61 for review of compliance with the filing of the Confidential Guardianship Status Report (Judicial Council Form GC-251). If a completed GC-251 has been filed in a timely fashion prior to the court date, appearances will be waived.

3. Guardianship of Areli Garcia Garcia 24PR00299 Case Management Conference

TENTATIVE RULING: No appearances required. The ward will turn 21 years old next year and the guardianship will terminate by operation of law. The case is continued to January 5, 2027, at 9:00 a.m. for a hearing on termination of the guardianship, at which no appearances will be required.

4. Guardianship of Alexander John O’Neill 24PR00859

Case Management Conference

TENTATIVE RULING: No appearances required. The required document has been received and reviewed. The matter is set for the next annual Case Management Conference at 9:00 a.m. on July 6, 2027, in Department 61 for review of compliance with the filing of the Confidential Guardianship Status Report (Judicial Council Form GC-251). If a completed GC-251 has been filed in a timely fashion prior to the court date, appearances will be waived.

5. Guardianship of Jalen Joseph Dean Merritt 24PR00958 Order to Show Cause

TENTATIVE RULING:

No appearances required. The Order to Show Cause filed June 12, 2026, is vacated. The required document has been received and reviewed. The matter is set for the next annual Case Management Conference at 9:00 a.m. on May 4, 2027, in Department 61 for review of compliance with the filing of the Confidential Guardianship Status Report (Judicial Council Form GC-251). If a completed GC-251 has been filed in a timely fashion prior to the court date, appearances will be waived.

6. Guardianship of Zayden Natalie Dailyn Yoder 24PR01083 Case Management Conference

TENTATIVE RULING: Appearances ARE REQUIRED. The Guardian is to appear and address the issues of education and school enrollment of the ward, as well as transfer of the guardianship to the state of Indiana. The required status report has been received and reviewed. In addition to the court appearance on July 7, 2026, the matter is set for the next annual Case Management Conference at 9:00 a.m. on July 6, 2027, in Department 61 for review of compliance with the filing of the Confidential Guardianship Status Report (Judicial Council Form GC-251). Assuming the guardianship continues to exist in the state of California, if a completed GC-251 has been filed in a timely fashion prior to the court date, appearances will be waived.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share