DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV123579·alameda·Civil·Writ of Mandate
Hearing about 2 months agoDENIED as moot and dismisses this case without prejudice

CHI vs ALAMEDA COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE

Writ of Mandate to Enforce Prior Order and/or for Order to Show Cause re: Contempt

Hearing date
Jul 14, 2026
Department
514
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffPengfei Philip Chi
DefendantALAMEDA COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE

Ruling

25CV123579: CHI vs ALAMEDA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE 07/14/2026 Hearing on Motion - Other for Writ of Mandate to Enforce Prior Order and/or for Order to Show Cause re: Contempt; filed by Pengfei Philip Chi (Plaintiff) CRS# 579605351321 in Department 514

Tentative Ruling - 07/10/2026 Julie Wilensky

Pursuant to the status report filed by Petitioner on 7/10/2026, the Court DENIES the pending motion as moot and dismisses this case without prejudice.

HOW DO I CONTEST A TENTATIVE RULING?

THROUGH ECOURT Notify the Court and all the other parties no later than 4:00 PM one court day before the scheduled hearing, and briefly identify the issues you wish to argue through the following steps: 1. Log into eCourt Public Portal 2. Case Search 3. Enter the Case Number and select “Search” 4. Select the Case Name 5. Select the Tentative Rulings Tab 6. Select “Click to Contest this Ruling” 7. Enter your Name and Reason for Contesting 8. Select “Proceed”

BY EMAIL Send an email to the DEPARTMENT CLERK and all the other parties. This will permit the department clerk to send invitations to counsel to appear remotely.

BOTH ECOURT AND EMAIL notices are required.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share