DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24CV430173·santaclara·Civil·Personal Injury
Hearing about 2 months agoOFF CALENDAR

Lee Leong vs Ashley A. Lopez

Motion for Sanctions

Hearing date
Jul 14, 2026
Department
1
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Sanctions rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffLee Leong
DefendantAshley A. Lopez

Ruling

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 1 Honorable Eunice Lee, Presiding TBD, Courtroom Clerk 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113

DATE: July 14, 2026 TIME: 9:00 A.M. and 9:01 A.M. To contest the ruling, call the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. Make sure to also let the other side know before 4:00 P.M. that you plan to contest the ruling, in accordance with California Rule of Court, Rule 3.1308(a)(1) and Local Rule 8D.

**Please specify the issue to be contested when calling the Court and counsel**

LAW AND MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS 9:00 A.M. LINE 1 24CV430173 Lee Leong vs Motion for Sanctions Ashley A. Lopez OFF CALENDAR. On March 26, 2026, the parties notified the court of a settlement agreement. On July 9, 2026, the moving party/defendant Lopez moved to dismiss the motion. LINE 2 24CV433824 Joseph Alejandro Motion to Appoint Appraiser for Partition vs Hugo Santos et OFF CALENDAR. On July 6, 2026, the parties reached a stipulation for al interlocutory judgment of partition and appointment of referee, which the Court granted.

The parties moved to vacate this hearing date. LINE 3 24CV442351 City of San Jose Permanent Injunction and Entry of Default Judgment vs Roy Abbott Parties to Appear. Scroll down to Line 3 for Tentative Ruling. LINE 4 24CV451675 Leticia Reyes Motion for Leave to File Parral vs Sandridge Scroll down to Line 4 for Tentative Ruling. LLP et al LINE 5 25CV463382 UHG I LLC vs Motion for Order to Deem Admissions Admitted Travis Fong Scroll down to Line 5 for Tentative Ruling. LINE 6 25CV467382 Daniel Kelly vs Petition to Compel Arbitration Ford Motor Scroll down to Line 6 for Tentative Ruling.

Company et al LINES 25CV469153 Aida Setka vs Motion to Strike (Line # 7) and Demurrer (Line # 8) 7-8 Subaru of Scroll down to Lines 7 - 8 for Tentative Ruling. America, Inc. et al LINE 9 25CV479068 Creditors Motion to Strike Adjustment Bureau, Scroll down to Line 9 for Tentative Ruling. Inc. vs Jam General Contractors Inc. et al.

- oo0oo -

2

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share