Request for Order of Child Custody, Visitation, Spousal Support, Child Support
1 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 4
5) 6 DY NGUYEN,) Case Number: FDI-24-799785) 7 Petitioner) Hearing Date: July 14, 2026) 8 VS.) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM) 9 JENNIFER FOXWORTH,) Department: 404) 10 Respondent) Presiding: AI MORI) 11) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHILD CUSTODY, VISITATION (PARENTING TIME), SPOUSAL OR 13 PARTNER SUPPORT, CHILD SUPPORT 14 TENTATIVE RULING 15 Having read and considered the pleadings, declarations, and other evidence submitted in this matter, the 16 Court makes the following findings and orders: 17 A. Procedural History 18 1) Petitioner Dy Nguyen and Respondent Jennifer Foxworth married on 7/29/2013.
Petitioner 19 contends the parties separated on 8/4/2024, for a marriage of 10 years. Respondent contends the 20 parties separated on 6/24/2023, for a marriage of 9 years and 10 months. The parties have two 21 minor children, Mazzi (DOB: 2/21/2016, age 10) and Enzo (DOB: 1/6/2018, age 8). Petitioner is 22 self-represented, although Petitioner has a consulting attorney (Janice Cho). Respondent is 23 represented by attorney Nancy Lawlor. 24 2) On for hearing is Petitioner’s 4/15/2026 request seeking joint legal and joint physical custody of 25 the children and to formalize the following parenting time schedule that she states has been in 26 place for 2 years: Monday to Tuesday with Petitioner, Wednesday to Thursday with Respondent, 27 and alternating weekends. (She states she had a larger timeshare than Respondent before the 28 parties agreed to a 50/50 schedule.)
Petitioner also seeks guideline child support, an order to share 29 child support add-ons, temporary guideline spousal support, a Smith / Ostler child and temporary
1 spousal support, and an earnings assignment order. Petitioner states that, to date, Respondent has 2 been paying her $1,500 per month in voluntary “family support.” 3 3) On 5/6/2026, Respondent filed a response in which she seeks an order for Petitioner to have 4 parenting time on alternate weekends only, from Friday school pick up (or 3PM if no school) to 5 Sunday at 6PM. She states that Mazzi has been diagnosed with being on the autism spectrum and 6 has suffered severe anxiety since staying with Petitioner, her new partner Monica, and Monica’s 7 two young boys who often stay overnight.
Respondent states that Enzo reported that Petitioner 8 “pinches” her so hard it “really hurts” and that Petitioner admitted this conduct by text. 9 Respondent states that Petitioner also has a long history of “erratic mental health issues” and 10 attended an outpatient program regarding her mental issues in early 2024. Respondent states that 11 Petitioner invests her attention and time on Monica’s issues, which she believes causes the 12 parties’ children to suffer. Respondent agrees to guideline child with mutual Smith / Ostler 13 orders.
Respondent states that while her total annual income usually exceeds Petitioner’s, 14 Petitioner’s base monthly income exceeds Respondent’s. Respondent states she paid Petitioner 15 $750 on 5/1/2026 “though this amount can be adjusted as this was from a previous XSpouse that 16 was shared a month or more ago.” Respondent states she does not agree to pay temporary spousal 17 support because “[Petitioner] did not support me during marriage while I worked, we both 18 worked and cared for our children.
In fact, I cared for them while she had to go to outpatient care 19 for her mental health and there are instances of domestic violence against me when she smashed 20 pots and hit me in a fit of rage. She earns as much if not more than I as to base pay, and 21 additionally, she has had ample funds than I have to travel constantly all over the world the last 22 two years.” Respondent questions why Petitioner is no longer working during the summer. 23 4) On 5/6/2026, Respondent filed an Income and Expense Declaration.
Respondent states she is 42 24 years old and is a Police Sergeant / Investigator. Respondent states that she earns $16,516 on 25 average per month in base pay, plus $7,241 on average per month for overtime pay. Respondent 26 states her monthly expenses total $10,646. 27 5) On 6/26/2026, Petitioner filed an Income and Expense Declaration. Petitioner states she is 43 28 years old and is a Special Education Teacher. Petitioner states that over the course of 12 months, 29 she earns on average $13,315.97 per month, plus an average of $2,340.48 per month in overtime.
1 Petitioner states she is earning $656.40 per month from an employer-paid medical stipend, which 2 will end on 9/30/2026. Petitioner states her monthly expenses total $9,577. 3 6) On 6/26/2026, Petitioner filed a reply in which she states she voluntarily attended an outpatient 4 program and that there is nothing in the record or in the history of the parties’ relationship or her 5 time with the children that supports ordering a different parenting time schedule than what the 6 parties have been following for the last 2+ years.
Petitioner states that Mazzi was diagnosed with 7 general anxiety disorder before the parties separated; her anxiety was not caused by Petitioner’s 8 relationship with Monica, who does not live in Petitioner’s home. Petitioner states that she 9 believes Respondent’s requests and statements are made in retaliation because she is unhappy that 10 Petitioner decided to seek Court orders after mediation efforts failed. Petitioner specifies that she 11 would like Respondent’s “very recent predictable overtime as a Sergeant... included with her 12 Base Wages in the X-Spouse Calculation.”
Respondent states she has worked summer 13 assignments some years, but not others, and summer school is “optional and not guaranteed.” 14 Petitioner explains that her cash-in-lieu medical benefit that she currently receives will end on 15 10/1/2026 because the parties recently agreed to move the children to Petitioner’s health 16 insurance effective 10/1/2026. Petitioner also states Respondent’s base pay is higher than 17 Petitioner’s base pay. 18 7) On 6/26/2026, Petitioner filed a Statement of Support Calculations.
Petitioner requests support 19 orders retroactive to 4/15/2026 (the date she filed her Request for Order). 20 8) The parties reached a partial agreement at mediation. On 7/2/2026, a Stipulation and Order was 21 filed reflecting the partial agreement for joint legal and joint physical custody and other 22 agreements including passport exchanges, medical decisions, usage of a shared calendar, holiday 23 and break schedules, communication regarding new partners, and decisions regarding the 24 children’s schools. 25 9) On 7/7/2026, Respondent filed a Statement of Support Calculations. 26 10) On 7/7/2026, Respondent filed a Sur-Reply to Petitioner’s Reply.
Among other arguments made, 27 Respondent states that her overtime is not predictable nor guaranteed, and expects the mayor to 28 slash overtime for the police force. Respondent also states that her base wages will increase by 29 $3,000 gross annually commencing 7/1/2026, to bring her total gross base to $217,748 per year.
1 Respondent states she will agree to “Bridge Forensics XSpouse inputs at Exhibit 5 of Petitioner’s 2 Support calculations... along with a dual Ostler / Smith order for other income, or alternatively, 3 with one change being that my base wages will now be an annual gross income of $217,748, not 4 $214,579.” Respondent asks that there be a quarterly true-up of income for Ostler / Smith. 5 Respondent also states there is no retroactive support due because the $1,500 per month between 6 8/2024 – 4/2026 and $750 per month commencing May 2026 that she was paying in voluntary 7 family support is more than the base support due and “included a general amount for all my other 8 income.” 9 B.
Findings and Order 10 1) Custody and Visitation 11 a. This Court has jurisdiction to make child custody orders in this case under the Uniform 12 Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act. A violation of this order may subject 13 the party in violation to civil or criminal penalties, or both. The country of habitual 14 residence of the minor children is the United States. 15 b. The Court finds it is in the children’s best interests to maintain the current order for joint 16 legal and 50/50 physical custody to the parties, with Mondays and Tuesdays to Petitioner, 17 Wednesdays and Thursdays to Respondent, and alternating weekends between the 18 parties.
The parties shall meet and confer and agree in writing (text message or email is 19 acceptable) to the specific times and locations of the exchanges and may call Family 20 Court Services at (415) 238-3623 if they need assistance in agreeing to the specific times 21 and locations of the exchanges. 22 c. The parties shall not use physical discipline to discipline the children. 23 2) Base Child and Spousal Support 24 a. Petitioner’s request for child and temporary spousal support orders effective 4/15/2026 25 (the date Petitioner filed her Request for Order) is hereby granted. 26 b.
Petitioner’s request to include Respondent’s overtime pay in the base support calculation 27 is denied. The Court instead adopts the alternative XSpouse inputs proposed in Exhibit 5 28 of Petitioner’s Statement of Support Calculations filed 6/26/2026 and in Respondent’s 29 Statement of Support Calculations filed 7/7/2026.
1 c. For the period 4/15/2026 – 6/30/2026, in accordance with the XSpouse calculation 2 attached hereto and incorporated herein, Respondent shall pay Petitioner $447 per month 3 in guideline child support and $0 in temporary spousal support. 4 d. Effective 7/1/2026 (when Respondent’s raise goes into effect), in accordance with the 5 second XSpouse calculation attached hereto and incorporated herein, Respondent shall 6 pay Petitioner $466 per month in guideline child support and $0 in temporary spousal 7 support.
Base child support shall be paid by the 5th of each month. 8 e. If Respondent has already paid Petitioner $750 for base child support for the month of 9 July 2026, Respondent shall receive a credit towards base child support in the amount of 10 $750 - $466 = $284 for the month of August 2026. 11 3) Child Support Add-Ons 12 a. After Respondent pays base child support to Petitioner, Respondent will have 53% of the 13 parties’ combined net spendable base income and Petitioner will have 47% of the parties’ 14 combined net spendable base income.
For ease of calculation, effective 4/15/2026, the 15 parties shall share equally the following child support add-ons: 16 i. Childcare costs as defined by Family Code Section 4062(a)(1) 17 ii. Reasonable uninsured healthcare costs for the children 18 iii. The costs of mutually agreed upon extracurricular activity expenses for the 19 children. Consent for the children to participate in an activity shall not be 20 unreasonably withheld. 21 b. The procedure for requesting and paying reimbursements for uninsured healthcare costs 22 for the children shall be as set forth in Judicial Council Form FL-192. 23 c.
The procedure for requesting and paying reimbursements for qualifying childcare costs 24 and extracurricular activities shall be as follows. When a party (e.g. Party A) pays for a 25 qualifying expense, within 30 days of paying the expense, Party A shall present to Party 26 B: (a) an itemized statement of charges, (b) proof of payment, and (c) the amount due and 27 owing from Party B. Within 10 days of receiving this information, Party B shall submit a 28 payment to Party A for Party B’s share of the expense. 29
1 2) Smith / Ostler Child and Temporary Support 2 a. For the period 4/15/2026 – 6/30/2026, in addition to base child and temporary spousal 3 support, the parties shall pay a portion of all additional gross income (e.g., overtime pay, 4 bonuses, summer instruction income) received in excess of their base salary, pursuant to the 5 Bonus Tables attached the first XSpouse calculation. 6 b. Effective 7/1/2026, in addition to base child and temporary spousal support, the parties shall 7 pay a portion of all additional gross income (e.g., overtime pay, bonuses, summer instruction 8 income) received in excess of their base salary, pursuant to the Bonus Tables attached the 9 second XSpouse calculation. 10 c.
The parties shall perform a quarterly true-up to determine Smith / Ostler child and temporary 11 spousal support due and owing between the parties. Commencing 7/15/2026, and thereafter 12 on January 15th, April 15th, July 15th, October 15th of each year, the parties shall exchange 13 documents showing all income received in the immediately preceding three months and the 14 parties shall meet and confer to determine what amount in Smith / Ostler child and temporary 15 spousal support, if any, is due and owing between the parties.
The parties shall aim to pay any 16 Smith / Ostler child and temporary spousal support due and owing between the parties no 17 later than January 31st, April 30th, July 31st, and October 31st. 18 3) Child and Temporary Spousal Support Arrears and Credits for the Period 4/15/2026 – 6/30/2026 19 a. No later than 7/15/2026, the parties shall exchange all documents showing all income 20 received for the period 4/15/2026 – 6/30/2026 as well as all reimbursement claims regarding 21 child support add-ons (as defined above) incurred during this period.
The parties shall meet 22 and confer to determine what support arrears or credits may be owed by either party for this 23 period. Respondent shall receive a credit for any payments she made to Petitioner in 24 voluntary support paid between 4/1/2026 – 6/30/2026. Respondent shall receive a credit for 25 any support overpayments to Petitioner paid between 4/1/2026 – 6/30/2026, and the parties 26 shall meet and confer to determine how Respondent shall be reimbursed for the overpayment. 27 4) Respondent’s attorney shall prepare the Findings and Order After Hearing, which shall include as 28 attachments a mandatory FL-342 form, two XSpouse calculations, both sets of Bonus Tables, and 29 the FL-192 form.
1 5) Preparation of Order: If you are directed by the court to prepare the order after hearing – within
2 10 calendar days of the hearing you must either: (a) Serve the proposed order to the other 3 party/counsel for approval, and follow the procedures set forth in CA Rules of Court, Rule 4 5.125(c), or (b) If the other party did not appear or the matter was uncontested, submit the
5 proposed order after hearing directly to the court. Failure to submit the order after hearing within 6 10 days may allow the other party to prepare a proposed order and submit it to the court in 7 accordance with CA Rules of Court, Rule 5.125(d). 8
12
16
20
24
28
nguyen v. foxworth xspouse - eff. 4-15-2026 - 6-30-2026.xsp Xspouse 2026-1-CA
Fixed Shares Party A Party B Monthly figures Cash Flow #of children 0 2 2026 Guideline Proposed % time with NCP 49.99 % 0.00 % Comb. net spendable 20122 20122 Filing status HH/MLA HH/MLA GUIDELINE Percent change 0% 0% # exemptions 2 2 Nets(adjusted) Party A Wages+salary 13365 17882 Party A 9023 Payment cost/benefit 447 447 Self-employed income 0 0 Party B 11099 Net spendable income 9470 9470 Other taxable income 0 0 Total 20122 Change from guideline 0 0 TANF+CS received 0 0 Support Other nontaxble income 0 0 Addons % of combined spendable 47% 47% 0 New spouse income 0 0 Guideln CS % of saving over guideline 0% 0% 447 401(k) employee contrib 550 1300 Total taxes 2672 2672 S.Clara SS 0 Adjustments to income 0 0 Dep. exemption value 0 0 Total 447 SS paid prev marriage 0 0 # withholding allowances 0 0 - CS paid prev marriage 0 0 Settings changed Net wage paycheck 8732 8732 Health insurance 0 0 Party B Other medical expense 0 0 Payment cost/benefit -447 -447 Property tax expense 924 0 Net spendable income 10652 10652 Ded interest expense 1847 0 Proposed Change from guideline 0 0 Charitable contributions 0 0 Tactic 9 % of combined spendable 53% 53% Misc tax deductions 0 0 CS 447 Qual bus income ded 0 0 SS % of saving over guideline 0% 0% 0 Required union dues 140 0 Total Total taxes 4322 4322 447 Mandatory retirement 1530 2461 Dep. exemption value 0 0 Hardship deduction 0 * 0 * Saving 0 # withholding allowances 0 0 Other GDL deductions 0 0 Releases 0 Net wage paycheck 10704 10704 Child care expenses 0 0
Party B pays Guideline CS, Proposed CS
FC 4055 checking: ON Per Child Information Timeshare cce(A) cce(B) Addons Payor Basic CS Payor Pres CS Payor All children 49 - 51 0 0 0 Party A 447 Party B 447 Party B
Mazzi 49 - 51 0 0 0 Party A 167 Party B 167 Party B Enzo 49 - 51 0 0 0 Party A 279 Party B 279 Party B
Time: 10:30:38 Superior Court of California Date: 07/13/26 County of San Francisco
7/13/26, 10:27 AM Annual Bonus Income 2026-07-13 10:27:12 Superior Court of California Xspouse 2026-1-CA County of San Francisco nguyen v. foxworth xspouse - eff. 4-15-2026 - 6-30- 2026.xsp
Annual Bonus Income Party_A Cost is an increase in support paid or a decrease in support received by this spouse Bonus income may reverse direction of CS and/or SS Annual bonus paid to Party_B: 0 R = recipient of support Prior relationship(s): OFF
Additional Cost to Party_A Child Support Spousal Support Total CS Total SS Party_A's Bonus % of bonus $ % of bonus $ (adjusted) 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 5,000 13.78 689 0.00 0 4,669 R 0 10,000 13.72 1,372 0.00 0 3,986 R 0 15,000 13.54 2,031 0.00 0 3,327 R 0 20,000 13.41 2,683 0.00 0 2,675 R 0 25,000 13.37 3,342 0.00 0 2,016 R 0 30,000 13.50 4,050 0.00 0 1,308 R 0 35,000 13.58 4,752 0.00 0 606 R 0 40,000 13.62 5,448 0.00 0 90 0 45,000 13.62 6,130 0.00 0 772 0 50,000 13.61 6,807 0.00 0 1,448 0 55,000 13.60 7,479 0.00 0 2,121 0 60,000 13.58 8,146 0.00 0 2,788 0 65,000 13.55 8,809 0.00 0 3,451 0 70,000 13.52 9,467 0.00 0 4,109 0 75,000 13.50 10,122 0.00 0 4,763 0 80,000 13.46 10,772 0.00 0 5,414 0 85,000 13.43 11,418 0.00 0 6,060 0 90,000 13.40 12,060 0.00 0 6,702 0 95,000 13.37 12,699 0.79 755 7,341 755 100,000 13.33 13,334 1.54 1,543 7,976 1,543 105,000 13.30 13,966 2.22 2,333 8,608 2,333 110,000 13.27 14,594 2.84 3,127 9,236 3,127 115,000 13.23 15,220 3.41 3,923 9,861 3,923 120,000 13.18 15,811 3.90 4,683 10,453 4,683 125,000 13.09 16,363 4.32 5,397 11,004 5,397 130,000 13.01 16,912 4.70 6,114 11,554 6,114 135,000 12.93 17,459 5.06 6,833 12,101 6,833 140,000 12.86 18,004 5.40 7,553 12,646 7,553 145,000 12.79 18,547 5.71 8,276 13,189 8,276 150,000 12.72 19,087 6.00 9,000 13,729 9,000 155,000 12.66 19,626 6.28 9,727 14,268 9,727 160,000 12.60 20,162 6.53 10,455 14,804 10,455 165,000 12.54 20,697 6.78 11,185 15,339 11,185 170,000 12.49 21,230 7.01 11,916 15,871 11,916 175,000 12.43 21,760 7.23 12,649 16,402 12,649 180,000 12.38 22,283 7.43 13,375 16,924 13,375 185,000 12.32 22,786 7.61 14,078 17,428 14,078 190,000 12.26 23,287 7.78 14,782 17,929 14,782 195,000 12.20 23,787 7.94 15,487 18,429 15,487 200,000 12.14 24,286 8.10 16,194 18,927 16,194
file:///C:/Users/eeib/AppData/Local/Temp/17/Xtemp/AnnualBonus.html 1/1
7/13/26, 10:25 AM Annual Bonus Income 2026-07-13 10:25:50 Superior Court of California Xspouse 2026-1-CA County of San Francisco nguyen v. foxworth xspouse - eff. 4-15-2026 - 6-30- 2026.xsp
Annual Bonus Income Party_B Cost is an increase in support paid or a decrease in support received by this spouse Bonus income may reverse direction of CS and/or SS Annual bonus paid to Party_A: 0 R = recipient of support Prior relationship(s): OFF
Additional Cost to Party_B Child Support Spousal Support Total CS Total SS Party_B's Bonus % of bonus $ % of bonus $ (adjusted) 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 R 0 R 5,000 13.07 654 4.51 226 6,012 226 10,000 13.02 1,302 9.48 948 6,660 948 15,000 12.97 1,946 11.17 1,676 7,304 1,676 20,000 12.92 2,584 12.03 2,407 7,943 2,407 25,000 12.88 3,219 12.57 3,142 8,577 3,142 30,000 12.83 3,849 12.94 3,882 9,207 3,882 35,000 12.78 4,475 13.21 4,625 9,833 4,625 40,000 12.74 5,096 13.43 5,372 10,454 5,372 45,000 12.70 5,714 13.60 6,122 11,072 6,122 50,000 12.66 6,328 13.75 6,876 11,686 6,876 55,000 12.62 6,938 13.88 7,633 12,296 7,633 60,000 12.48 7,491 13.87 8,324 12,849 8,324 65,000 12.34 8,018 13.83 8,990 13,376 8,990 70,000 12.20 8,543 13.80 9,658 13,901 9,658 75,000 12.09 9,065 13.77 10,329 14,423 10,329 80,000 11.98 9,585 13.75 11,002 14,943 11,002 85,000 11.89 10,102 13.74 11,676 15,460 11,676 90,000 11.80 10,618 13.73 12,353 15,976 12,353 95,000 11.72 11,131 13.72 13,032 16,489 13,032 100,000 11.64 11,642 13.71 13,713 17,000 13,713 105,000 11.57 12,151 13.71 14,395 17,509 14,395 110,000 11.51 12,657 13.71 15,080 18,015 15,080 115,000 11.43 13,140 13.68 15,735 18,498 15,735 120,000 11.35 13,622 13.66 16,394 18,980 16,394 125,000 11.30 14,129 13.67 17,092 19,487 17,092 130,000 11.26 14,635 13.69 17,792 19,993 17,792 135,000 11.21 15,139 13.70 18,494 20,497 18,494 140,000 11.17 15,641 13.71 19,197 21,000 19,197 145,000 11.13 16,142 13.73 19,902 21,500 19,902 150,000 11.09 16,641 13.74 20,608 21,999 20,608 155,000 11.06 17,138 13.75 21,316 22,496 21,316 160,000 11.02 17,634 13.77 22,025 22,992 22,025 165,000 10.99 18,128 13.78 22,736 23,486 22,736 170,000 10.95 18,620 13.79 23,448 23,978 23,448 175,000 10.92 19,111 13.81 24,161 24,469 24,161 180,000 10.89 19,601 13.82 24,876 24,959 24,876 185,000 10.86 20,089 13.83 25,592 25,447 25,592 190,000 10.83 20,576 13.85 26,309 25,934 26,309 195,000 10.80 21,061 13.86 27,027 26,419 27,027 200,000 10.77 21,545 13.87 27,747 26,904 27,747
file:///C:/Users/eeib/AppData/Local/Temp/17/Xtemp/AnnualBonus.html 1/1
nguyen v. foxworth xspouse - eff. 7-1-2026.xsp Xspouse 2026-1-CA
Fixed Shares Party A Party B Monthly figures Cash Flow #of children 0 2 2026 Guideline Proposed % time with NCP 49.99 % 0.00 % Comb. net spendable 20215 20215 Filing status HH/MLA HH/MLA GUIDELINE Percent change 0% 0% # exemptions 2 2 Nets(adjusted) Party A Wages+salary 13365 18146 Party A 9023 Payment cost/benefit 466 466 Self-employed income 0 0 Party B 11192 Net spendable income 9489 9489 Other taxable income 0 0 Total 20215 Change from guideline 0 0 TANF+CS received 0 0 Support Other nontaxble income 0 0 Addons % of combined spendable 47% 47% 0 New spouse income 0 0 Guideln CS % of saving over guideline 0% 0% 466 401(k) employee contrib 550 1300 Total taxes 2672 2672 S.Clara SS 0 Adjustments to income 0 0 Dep. exemption value 0 0 Total 466 SS paid prev marriage 0 0 # withholding allowances 0 0 - CS paid prev marriage 0 0 Settings changed Net wage paycheck 8732 8732 Health insurance 0 73 Party B Other medical expense 0 0 Payment cost/benefit -466 -466 Property tax expense 924 0 Net spendable income 10726 10726 Ded interest expense 1847 0 Proposed Change from guideline 0 0 Charitable contributions 0 0 Tactic 9 % of combined spendable 53% 53% Misc tax deductions 0 0 CS 466 Qual bus income ded 0 0 SS % of saving over guideline 0% 0% 0 Required union dues 140 0 Total Total taxes 4420 4420 466 Mandatory retirement 1530 2461 Dep. exemption value 0 0 Hardship deduction 0 * 0 * Saving 0 # withholding allowances 0 0 Other GDL deductions 0 0 Releases 0 Net wage paycheck 10868 10868 Child care expenses 0 0
Party B pays Guideline CS, Proposed CS
FC 4055 checking: ON Per Child Information Timeshare cce(A) cce(B) Addons Payor Basic CS Payor Pres CS Payor All children 49 - 51 0 0 0 Party A 466 Party B 466 Party B
Mazzi 49 - 51 0 0 0 Party A 175 Party B 175 Party B Enzo 49 - 51 0 0 0 Party A 291 Party B 291 Party B
Time: 10:31:29 Superior Court of California Date: 07/13/26 County of San Francisco
7/13/26, 10:18 AM Annual Bonus Income 2026-07-13 10:18:19 Superior Court of California Xspouse 2026-1-CA County of San Francisco nguyen v. foxworth xspouse.xsp
Annual Bonus Income Party_A Cost is an increase in support paid or a decrease in support received by this spouse Bonus income may reverse direction of CS and/or SS Annual bonus paid to Party_B: 0 R = recipient of support Prior relationship(s): OFF
Additional Cost to Party_A Child Support Spousal Support Total CS Total SS Party_A's Bonus % of bonus $ % of bonus $ (adjusted) 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 5,000 13.78 689 0.00 0 4,902 R 0 10,000 13.72 1,372 0.00 0 4,220 R 0 15,000 13.53 2,030 0.00 0 3,561 R 0 20,000 13.41 2,682 0.00 0 2,909 R 0 25,000 13.36 3,341 0.00 0 2,250 R 0 30,000 13.50 4,049 0.00 0 1,542 R 0 35,000 13.57 4,751 0.00 0 840 R 0 40,000 13.62 5,447 0.00 0 144 R 0 45,000 13.62 6,129 0.00 0 538 0 50,000 13.61 6,806 0.00 0 1,215 0 55,000 13.60 7,478 0.00 0 1,887 0 60,000 13.58 8,145 0.00 0 2,554 0 65,000 13.55 8,808 0.00 0 3,217 0 70,000 13.52 9,467 0.00 0 3,876 0 75,000 13.49 10,121 0.00 0 4,530 0 80,000 13.46 10,772 0.00 0 5,180 0 85,000 13.43 11,418 0.00 0 5,827 0 90,000 13.40 12,060 0.00 0 6,469 0 95,000 13.37 12,699 0.44 420 7,108 420 100,000 13.33 13,335 1.21 1,208 7,744 1,208 105,000 13.30 13,967 1.90 1,998 8,375 1,998 110,000 13.27 14,595 2.54 2,792 9,004 2,792 115,000 13.24 15,221 3.12 3,588 9,629 3,588 120,000 13.18 15,812 3.62 4,347 10,221 4,347 125,000 13.09 16,364 4.05 5,062 10,773 5,062 130,000 13.01 16,913 4.44 5,778 11,322 5,778 135,000 12.93 17,461 4.81 6,496 11,870 6,496 140,000 12.86 18,006 5.15 7,217 12,415 7,217 145,000 12.79 18,549 5.48 7,939 12,958 7,939 150,000 12.73 19,090 5.78 8,663 13,498 8,663 155,000 12.66 19,628 6.06 9,390 14,037 9,390 160,000 12.60 20,165 6.32 10,117 14,574 10,117 165,000 12.55 20,700 6.57 10,847 15,109 10,847 170,000 12.49 21,233 6.81 11,579 15,641 11,579 175,000 12.44 21,764 7.04 12,312 16,172 12,312 180,000 12.38 22,286 7.24 13,037 16,695 13,037 185,000 12.32 22,789 7.43 13,740 17,198 13,740 190,000 12.26 23,291 7.60 14,443 17,700 14,443 195,000 12.20 23,791 7.77 15,149 18,200 15,149 200,000 12.15 24,290 7.93 15,855 18,699 15,855
file:///C:/Users/eeib/AppData/Local/Temp/17/Xtemp/AnnualBonus.html 1/1
7/13/26, 10:17 AM Annual Bonus Income 2026-07-13 10:17:34 Superior Court of California Xspouse 2026-1-CA County of San Francisco nguyen v. foxworth xspouse.xsp
Annual Bonus Income Party_B Cost is an increase in support paid or a decrease in support received by this spouse Bonus income may reverse direction of CS and/or SS Annual bonus paid to Party_A: 0 R = recipient of support Prior relationship(s): OFF
Additional Cost to Party_B Child Support Spousal Support Total CS Total SS Party_B's Bonus % of bonus $ % of bonus $ (adjusted) 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0 R 0 R 5,000 13.03 652 9.65 482 6,243 482 10,000 12.98 1,298 12.07 1,207 6,890 1,207 15,000 12.94 1,940 12.90 1,935 7,532 1,935 20,000 12.89 2,578 13.34 2,668 8,169 2,668 25,000 12.84 3,210 13.62 3,405 8,802 3,405 30,000 12.80 3,839 13.82 4,146 9,430 4,146 35,000 12.75 4,463 13.97 4,890 10,054 4,890 40,000 12.71 5,083 14.10 5,638 10,675 5,638 45,000 12.67 5,700 14.20 6,390 11,291 6,390 50,000 12.62 6,312 14.29 7,144 11,904 7,144 55,000 12.54 6,895 14.31 7,869 12,486 7,869 60,000 12.37 7,424 14.22 8,534 13,015 8,534 65,000 12.23 7,950 14.15 9,201 13,542 9,201 70,000 12.11 8,474 14.10 9,870 14,066 9,870 75,000 11.99 8,996 14.05 10,541 14,587 10,541 80,000 11.89 9,515 14.02 11,214 15,106 11,214 85,000 11.80 10,032 13.99 11,890 15,623 11,890 90,000 11.72 10,547 13.96 12,567 16,138 12,567 95,000 11.64 11,059 13.94 13,246 16,650 13,246 100,000 11.57 11,569 13.93 13,928 17,160 13,928 105,000 11.50 12,077 13.92 14,611 17,669 14,611 110,000 11.43 12,571 13.89 15,279 18,162 15,279 115,000 11.35 13,048 13.85 15,928 18,639 15,928 120,000 11.29 13,551 13.85 16,617 19,142 16,617 125,000 11.25 14,058 13.85 17,316 19,649 17,316 130,000 11.20 14,563 13.86 18,016 20,154 18,016 135,000 11.16 15,067 13.87 18,718 20,658 18,718 140,000 11.12 15,568 13.87 19,422 21,160 19,422 145,000 11.08 16,068 13.88 20,127 21,660 20,127 150,000 11.04 16,567 13.89 20,834 22,158 20,834 155,000 11.01 17,063 13.90 21,542 22,655 21,542 160,000 10.97 17,559 13.91 22,252 23,150 22,252 165,000 10.94 18,052 13.92 22,963 23,643 22,963 170,000 10.91 18,544 13.93 23,675 24,135 23,675 175,000 10.88 19,035 13.94 24,389 24,626 24,389 180,000 10.85 19,524 13.95 25,104 25,115 25,104 185,000 10.82 20,012 13.96 25,821 25,603 25,821 190,000 10.79 20,498 13.97 26,538 26,089 26,538 195,000 10.76 20,983 13.98 27,257 26,574 27,257 200,000 10.73 21,467 13.99 27,977 27,058 27,977
file:///C:/Users/eeib/AppData/Local/Temp/17/Xtemp/AnnualBonus.html 1/1
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”