DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC21594349·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing about 1 month agoPlease check back by 3pm for the Court's tentative ruling.

DAVID PLEIMANN VS. ROBBY PHILLIPS ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion To Enforce Settlement Agreement; For Entry Of Judgment Pursuant To Ccp 664.6; And For Monetary Reimbursement, Attorney Fees, Interest, Costs, And Related Relief

Hearing date
Jul 15, 2026
Department
501
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffDAVID PLEIMANN
DefendantROBBY PHILLIPS

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for Wednesday, July 15, 2026, line 1. 2-PLAINTIFF DAVID PLEIMANN Motion To Enforce Settlement Agreement; For Entry Of Judgment Pursuant To Ccp 664.6; And For Monetary Reimbursement, Attorney Fees, Interest, Costs, And Related Relief. Please check back by 3pm for the Court's tentative ruling. = (501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share