DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
23CV05084·santabarbara·Civil·Civil Law & Motion
Hearing about 2 months agoMotion to compel continued; motion to seal denied.

Maria Teresa Alcantara, CPA v Ensign Services Inc et al

Motion to Compel; Motion to Seal

Hearing date
Jul 13, 2026
Department
SB Dept 5
Prevailing
Mixed
Next hearing
Aug 17, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffMaria Teresa Alcantara
DefendantEnsign Services Inc

Ruling

Case Number

Case Type Civil Law & Motion Hearing Date / Time Mon, 07/13/2026 - 10:00 Nature of Proceedings Motion to Compel; Motion to Seal Tentative Ruling The motions to compel further responses to discovery, previously set for hearing on this calendar, have been continued by stipulation and order to August 17, 2026. There remains on this calendar, and not subject to the parties' stipulation, the application of plaintiff Maria Teresa Alcantara to file under seal exhibit M to the declaration of David S. Secrest in support of plaintiff's motion to compel further responses to requests for production of documents, which exhibit M was lodged with the court provisionally under seal on April 21, 2026.

The application was made solely because the exhibit M documents were identified by defendants as confidential. The application specifically asserts that the moving party does not claim these documents are confidential (Secrest decl., P. 7.) There is no joinder or other response made in support of the application by defendants. Although not subject to the strict requirements of California Rules of Court, rules 2.550 and 2.551 because the exhibit M documents were lodged in connection with a discovery motion (rule 2.550(a)(3)), there still needs to be some factual showing to justify sealing papers filed with the court. (See NBC Subsidiary (KNBC-TV), Inc. v.

Superior Court (1999) 20 Cal.4th 1178, 1212.) The only papers filed disclaim confidentiality. The motion to seal will therefore be denied.

Tentative Ruling: KNM Outdoor Tribe, LLC v. Roulette William Smith Tentative Ruling: KNM Outdoor Tribe, LLC v. Roulette William Smith

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share